TABLE 1.

Descriptions of papers addressing the association between IC and Performance in NPOs.

References	Country	Study	IC dimension	Performance	Type of	Participants	Participants
		methodology		measure	NPO	(number)	(NPO role)
Misener and Doherty, 2013	Canada	Qualitative	R	Subjective	Sport-related	20	NPOs presidents
Mohd Noor et al., 2015	Malaysia	Quantitative	H, R, S/O	Subjective	Any	271	NPOs employees
Zhu et al., 2016	Canada	Quantitative	H, S/O	Subjective	Any	376 (156 from NPOs)	NPOs directors
Wemmer et al., 2016	Germany	Quantitative	R	Subjective	Sport-related	292	NPOs directors
Cady et al., 2018	United States	Quantitative	H	Objective	Farming	285	NPOs members
Álvarez-González et al., 2017	Spain	Quantitative	R	Subjective	Any	325	NPOs board members
Benevene et al., 2018	Italy	Qualitative	H, R, S/O	Subjective	NPOs socio cooperatives	70	NPOs managers
Bontis et al., 2018	Italy	Quantitative	H, R, S/O	Objective, Subjective	NPOs socio cooperatives	151	NPOs board members
Vakharia et al., 2018	United States	Quantitative	H, R, S/Oa	Objective, Subjective	Arts-related	368	not specified

H, human capital; R, relational capital; S/O, structural/organizational capital. ^aIC dimensions were reorganized in a new construct.