Skip to main content
. 2020 May 5;11:336. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00336

Table 2.

Summary of studies comparing the frequency of DVT among patients with cryptogenic vs. known-cause stroke.

References Population % (n) Work-up for DVT DVT prevalence in Non-CS vs. CS, % (n) Time between Index stroke and DVT workup
Cramer et al. (22) Non-CS: 52% (n = 49)
CS: 48% (n = 46, among them
61% with an PFO or ASD)
MRI Venogramm Total patients 4% (2/49) vs. 20% (9/46); p = 0.025
Subgroup with PFO
0% (0/9) vs. 21% (6/28); p = 0.30
48.9 ± 16.1 h
Liberman et al. (23) All Patients had PFO
(n = 131)
CS: 74.8% (n = 98)
Non-CS: 25.2% (n = 33)
MRI Venogramm LE duplex ultrasound 9.1% (3/33) vs. 7.2% (7/98); p = 0.71 0–4 days

PFO, patent foramen ovale; CS, cryptogenic stroke; PE, pulmonary embolism; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; VTE, venous thromboembolism; MRV, magnetic resonance venography; N/A, not available.