Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr;9(2):709–721. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.10

Table 1. Advantages and limitations of auxiliary examination methods for penile vascular function.

Methods Author (year) Parameters Advantages Limitations Quantitative Objective
Intra-cavernous injection Virag (18) (1982) Rigidity retention Simple and rapid; first-line option; good repeatability; therapeutic effect; basic screening examination Invasive; subjective evaluation; susceptible result; false positive results; risk of prolonged erection and priapism No No
Color duplex Doppler ultrasound Lue et al. (19) (1985) End-diastolic velocity; peak systolic velocity; resistive index Non-invasive; second-line option; good repeatability; quantitative analysis; able to distinguish arterial ED Time consuming; operator-dependent; complicated operation; less reliable in diagnosing venous ED Yes Yes
Selective penile angiography Bähren et al. (20) (1988) Imaging Gold standard; affirmative examination Time consuming; invasive and expensive; complicated operation; affected by methodology; requires postinterventional surveillance No Yes
Magnetic resonance arteriography Dixon et al. (21) (1992) Imaging Almost noninvasive; good at evaluate pelvic structures; supplement to contraindications of angiography Expensive; non-specific images; cannot detect the distal pudendal and penile arteries No Yes
Computed tomography angiography Kawanishi et al. (22) (2001) Imaging Mild invasive; 3D-virtual images; independent of blood flow; direct detection of cavernosum; indicate other vascular diseases Expensive; complicated operation; lack of standardization of the parameters No Yes
Dynamic infusion cavernosometry and cavernosography Velcek et al. (23) (1982) Imaging; induced flow; maintain flow; pressure decay; equilibrium pressure; cavernous artery occlusion pressure Direct detection; third-line option; reflex venous reflux and leakage; good at diagnose venous ED Invasive; time consuming; false positive results; complicated operation Yes Yes
Share wave elastography Turkay et al. (24) (2017) Share wave elastography value Non-invasive; good repeatability; quantitative analysis Lack of standardization of the parameters Yes Yes
Endo-PAT Seager et al. (25) (2013) Augmentation index; reactive hyperaemic index Non-invasive; prediction of cardiovascular disease Controversial; lack of standardization of the parameters Yes Yes

ED, erectile dysfunction; PAT, peripheral arterial tonometry.