Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 17;17(8):2792. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082792

Table 6.

Estimates of indirect effects of parenting knowledge on motor development through different parental investments.

Indirect Effect Point Estimate Bootstrap S. E. 95% CI (Percentile) 95% CI (BC) 95% CI (BCa)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Knowledge on motor through source 0.01 ** 0.005 (0.003, 0.02) (0.004, 0.02) (0.004, 0.02)
Knowledge on motor through variety 0.06 *** 0.01 (0.04, 0.09) (0.04, 0.09) (0.04, 0.09)
Knowledge on motor through activity 0.03 *** 0.008 (0.01, 0.05) (0.02, 0.06) (0.02, 0.06)
Knowledge on motor through book 0.009 ** 0.005 (0.001,0.02) (0.002, 0.02) (0.002, 0.02)
Knowledge on motor through pbook 0.01 ** 0.005 (0.003, 0.02) (0.003, 0.02) (0.003, 0.02)
Knowledge on motor through toy 0.02 *** 0.006 (0.01, 0.04) (0.01, 0.03) (0.01, 0.03)
Knowledge on motor through magz 0.003 0.002 (−0.0008, 0.008) (0.0001, 0.01) (0.0001, 0.01)

Notes: (i) The mediators are the FCI seven subscales: sources of play materials (source), varieties of play materials (variety), play activities (activity), household books (book), picture books (pbook), play materials (toy), and magazines and newspapers (magz). (ii) Bootstrap standard errors reported in column (2) are based on resampling with 1000 replications. (iii) The percentile 95% CI in column (3) uses usual sampling distribution cutoffs without bias correction; the BC 95% CI in column (4) corrects for a bias in the distribution of bootstrap estimates of standard errors; and the BCa 95% CI in column (5) corrects for bias and skewness in the distribution of bootstrap estimates of standard errors. (iv) *** p < 0.01; ** p < 0.05.