Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 24;17(8):2946. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082946

Table 2.

Associations of residential radon exposure and cigarette smoking with lung cancer.

Variables Case, n Control, n Conditional Logistic Regression Conventional Logistic Regression
OR (95% CI) * p-Value OR (95% CI) p-Value
Residential radon
 Low (< 100 Bq/m3) 448 427 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 High (≥ 100 Bq/m3) 71 92 1.56 (1.03–2.37) 0.037 1.52 (1.00–2.31) 0.048
Cigarette smoking
 Non-smokers 297 338 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Smokers 222 181 2.53 (1.60–3.99) <0.001 2.50 (1.59–3.94) <0.001
Tobacco consumption
 Never-smoker 297 338 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Light smokers 9 7 3.05 (0.81–11.43) 0.739 2.47 (0.68–8.56) 0.797
 Moderate smokers 32 34 2.65 (1.32–5.30) 0.934 2.03 (1.11–3.71) 0.847
 Heavy smokers 178 85 5.56 (3.31–9.35) <0.001 4.24 (2.92–6.15) <0.001
Radon and smoking
 Low-radon non-smokers 262 282 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 High-radon non-smokers 35 56 1.40 (0.81–2.43) 0.231 1.40 (0.81–2.44) 0.230
 Low-radon smokers 186 145 2.42 (1.49–3.92) <0.001 2.42 (1.50–3.91) <0.001
 High-radon smokers 36 36 4.27 (2.14–8.52) <0.001 4.02 (2.03–7.97) <0.001

* Conditional logistic regression was adjusted for second-hand smoking, sleeping hours, indoor hours, housing type, floor, presence of house cracks, and green ratio. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. Conventional logistic regression was further adjusted for age and sex.