Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2020 May 11;174(7):727–729. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0298

Prevalence of Special Health Care Needs Among Foster Youth in a Nationally Representative Survey

Lucy A Bilaver 1, Judy Havlicek 2, Matthew M Davis 1,3,4
PMCID: PMC7215624  PMID: 32391875

Abstract

This analysis of a nationally representative cohort examines the association of foster care status with prevalence of special health care needs and specific categories of health disorders in children.


Children in foster care have the highest rates of chronic conditions of any child population.1 While the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being remains the gold standard for data on special health care needs (SCHNs) of children in foster care, the data do not permit comparisons between children in foster care and other types of care.2 We address this gap by describing current rates of SHCNs and specific mental health and developmental conditions for children across a range of caregiving circumstances.

Methods

We combined 2 years of parent-proxy survey data from the 2016-2017 National Survey of Children’s Health (N = 71 811 households).3 Weighted estimates are representative of children who are noninstitutionalized and aged 0 to 17 years old in the United States. The mean overall response rate was 39.1%. Because the study data are publicly available from the US Census Bureau and deidentified, the study is not considered human subjects research and does not require institutional review board approval.

For the first time in 2016, the National Survey of Children’s Health provided a public-use variable that identifies responses from foster parents as a category of caregivers. We examined 4 mutually exclusive caregiver types: foster parents; biological or adoptive parents; other, related caregivers (ie, grandparents, aunts or uncles, other relatives); or other, nonrelated caregivers (ie, stepparents, other nonrelatives). While living with foster parents implies court-ordered separation from birth parents, living with other, related or nonrelated caregivers may or may not involve the courts. To assess health, caregivers were asked whether a physician, health care professional, or educator ever told them that their child had a specific condition, and if so whether the condition was currently present. We examined the prevalence of 9 current health conditions and overall SHCNs based on a 5-question screening instrument.

We fit logistic regression models, controlling for demographics, health insurance adequacy, and household characteristics to estimate the mean marginal effect of caregiver type. All analyses used Stata version 14.2 (StataCorp) and accounted for the complex survey design; analyses are presented as population-weighted values. All P values were 2 tailed, with significance set at P < .05. Data were analyzed from November 2018 to April 2019.

Results

Overall, 227 476 of more than 70 million children (0.4%) had foster caregivers (Table 1). Nearly one-half of the children (44% [95% CI, 31.2%-58.5%]) living with foster parents met criteria for a SHCN. Children living with foster parents, compared with children living with biological or adoptive parents, had higher rates of current anxiety (16.0% [95% CI, 8.5%-28.0%] vs 5.9% [95% CI, 5.6%-6.3%]), behavioral disorders (20.5% [95% CI, 13.2%-30.5%] vs 5.7% [95% CI, 5.3%-6.1%]), developmental delays (19.3% [95% CI, 11.4%-30.9%] vs 4.6% [95% CI, 4.3%-5.0%]), and speech/language disorders (17.8% [95% CI, 9.8%-30.2%] vs 4.8% [95% CI, 4.4%-5.2%]). Caregiver type was associated with the prevalence of all health conditions, except for autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability or Down syndrome.

Table 1. Prevalence of Special Needs by Caregiver Type.

Current health condition % (95% CI)
All caregiver typesa Foster parent Related caregiver Other, nonrelated caregiver Biological or adoptive parents
Special health care needs 18.8 (18.1-19.4) 44.4 (31.2-58.5) 27.3 (23.2-31.8) 18.3 (9.2-33.2) 18.2 (17.6-18.8)
Learning disability 6.0 (5.5-6.4) 10.1 (5.4-18.3) 11.3 (8.5-14.8) 6.8 (2.6-16.7) 5.6 (5.2-6.1)
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder 7.4 (7.0-7.8) 11.0 (6.0-19.5) 12.0 (9.7-14.7) 6.0 (2.8-12.6) 7.1 (6.7-7.6)
Depression 2.5 (2.3-2.8) 4.3 (2.0-8.7) 5.6 (4.2-7.4) 2.9 (1.1-7.4) 2.4 (2.2-2.6)
Anxiety 6.0 (5.7-6.4) 16.0 (8.5-28.0) 7.4 (5.9-9.1) 3.5 (1.5-8.1) 5.9 (5.6-6.3)
Behavioral disorder 6.1 (5.7-6.5) 20.5 (13.2-30.5) 11.8 (9.8-14.3) 7.3 (3.4-15.3) 5.7 (5.3-6.1)
Autism spectrum disorderb 2.5 (2.2-2.8) 6.1 (1.9-17.9) 2.5 (1.6-3.8) 1.0 (0.3-3.2) 2.5 (2.1-2.8)
Developmental delay 4.9 (4.5-5.3) 19.3 (11.4-30.9) 7.9 (5.4-11.4) 6.0 (2.1-16.0) 4.6 (4.3-5.0)
Speech/language disorder 5.1 (4.7-5.5) 17.8 (9.8-30.2) 9.0 (5.6-14.3) 2.0 (0.6-6.5) 4.8 (4.4-5.2)
Intellectual disability or Down syndromeb 1.1 (0.9-1.3) 3.0 (1.2-7.3) 1.0 (0.6-1.7) 1.7 (0.2-11.3) 1.1 (0.9-1.3)
a

Baseline prevalence.

b

Global F test of equality across caregiver types was not significant.

Living with a foster parent vs a biological or adoptive parent was associated with significant positive mean marginal effect sizes in the probability of having a SHCN (27.5 [95% CI, 12.4-42.6]; P < .001), anxiety (15.7 [95% CI, 4.6-26.8]; P < .001), behavioral disorder (14.6 [95% CI, 4.2-25.0]), developmental delay (12.8 [95% CI, 3.5-22.0]), and/or speech/language disorder (10.9 [95% CI, 1.0-20.8]) (Table 2). Living with a related caregiver vs a biological or adoptive parent was associated with a probability increased by 3.1 to 3.9 percentage points of a current learning disability, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and depression. These effect sizes were comparable in magnitude with children living with foster parents.

Table 2. Mean Marginal Effect Size of Caregiver Type on Probability of Special Health Care Need.

Current health condition Caregiver typea
Foster parent Related caregiver Other, nonrelated caregiver
Mean marginal effect (95% CI) P valueb Mean marginal effect (95% CI) P valueb Mean marginal effect (95% CI) P valueb
Special health care needs 27.5 (12.4-42.6) <.001 7.6 (3.7-11.5) <.001 −0.02 (−10.6 to 10.6) >.99
Learning disability 4.4 (−2.4 to 11.1) .20 3.9 (1.3-6.5) <.001 −0.3 (−5.7 to 5.2) .92
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder 5.7 (−1.7 to 13.2) .13 3.9 (1.4-6.4) <.001 −1.0 (−5.4 to 3.5) .67
Depression 2.5 (−1.6 to 6.6) .22 3.1 (1.6-4.7) <.001 0.4 (−2.2 to 3.1) .74
Anxiety 15.7 (4.6-26.8) .01 2.4 (0.6-4.1) .01 −2.0 (−5.2 to 1.3) .24
Behavioral disorder 14.6 (4.2-25.0) .01 4.3 (2.2-6.4) <.001 1.3 (−3.7 to 6.3) .62
Autism spectrum disorder 3.8 (−3.8 to 11.3) .33 −0.3 (−1.4 to 0.7) .55 −1.8 (−2.9 to 0.7) <.001
Developmental delay 12.8 (3.5-22.0) .01 2.2 (−0.3 to 4.6) .08 1.1 (−4.7 to 6.9) .71
Speech/language disorder 10.9 (1.0-20.8) .03 3.1 (−0.3 to 6.6) .08 −2.9 (−5.4 to 0.4) .02
Intellectual disability or Down syndrome 1.6 (−1.2 to 4.4) .25 −0.3 (−0.8 to 0.2) .27 −0.04 (−2.4 to 2.3) .97
a

Reference: biological or adoptive parents.

b

P values are based on t tests using standard errors from logistic regression using complex survey design elements. Logistic regressions controlled for child's sex, age, race/ethnicity, and health insurance adequacy, as well as household poverty level, respondent's highest education, and census region.

Discussion

Living in foster care is associated with significantly higher probabilities of SHCNs and specific mental health and developmental conditions. Overall rates of SHCNs are higher than those measured in National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being I (35%) and support the findings from more recent studies that the prevalence of SHCN in children living in foster care remain substantial.4,5

The American Academy of Pediatrics recognizes the vital role of pediatricians serving children when permanent caregivers are absent. This is especially important for pediatricians serving children living with nonbiological, nonadoptive caregivers outside of the foster care system because of a lack of formal casework services. Ongoing monitoring of the prevalence of SHCNs among children living with foster parents and related caregivers, now possible with the newly redesigned National Survey of Children’s Health, is essential to illuminate the need for new practice supports and cross-system strategies to address the needs of this vulnerable population.6

References

  • 1.Leslie LK, Gordon JN, Meneken L, Premji K, Michelmore KL, Ganger W. The physical, developmental, and mental health needs of young children in child welfare by initial placement type. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005;26(3):177-185. doi: 10.1097/00004703-200506000-00003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stein REK, Hurlburt MS, Heneghan AM, et al. Chronic conditions among children investigated by child welfare: a national sample. Pediatrics. 2013;131(3):455-462. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.US Census Bureau 2017 National Survey of Children’s Health: guide to analysis of multi-year NSCH data. Published 2018. Accessed July 9, 2019. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/programs-surveys/nsch/tech-documentation/methodology/2017-NSCH-Guide-to-Multi-Year-Estimates.pdf
  • 4.Ringeisen H, Casanueva C, Urato M, Cross T. Special health care needs among children in the child welfare system. Pediatrics. 2008;122(1):e232-e241. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Turney K, Wildeman C. Mental and physical health of children in foster care. Pediatrics. 2016;138(5):e20161118. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zlotnik S, Wilson L, Scribano P, Wood JN, Noonan K; Mandates for Collaboration . Mandates for collaboration: health care and child welfare policy and practice reforms create the platform for improved health for children in foster care. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2015;45(10):316-322. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2015.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES