Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 12;17(8):2633. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082633

Table 1.

Reported menstrual material use by country. Material use is categorized using both a single-response and a multi-response variable.

Menstrual Material Uganda Kenya Ethiopia Ghana Burkina Faso Niger Lagos, Nigeria Kaduna, Nigeria Kinshasa, DRC Kongo Central, DRC Indonesia Rajasthan
(n = 2709) (n = 4364) (n = 4784) (n = 2837) (n = 2158) (n = 1913) (n = 1169) (n = 1993) (n = 2081) (n = 1109) (n = 8117) (n = 5023)
Grouped single-response material categories (% of respondents)
Pads only 52.2 77.5 34.0 82.7 13.6 9.7 74.7 27.4 73.3 20.8 87.7 39.1
Cloth only 30.6 9.0 38.4 8.6 58.0 59.8 4.0 55.7 3.6 29.5 7.3 49.0
Cotton wool only 1.6 2.5 1.2 0.3 13.2 12.1 1.2 0.3 0.8 6.8 0.1 0.3
Pads, cloth, cotton wool 12.5 7.8 7.0 3.4 4.1 1.8 2.6 8.9 1.9 8.3 3.0 10.4
Pads, cloth, cotton wool, other 1.2 2.3 2.5 3.4 1.8 2.5 9.5 4.4 11.1 15.4 0.2 0.2
Other 1 2.0 1.0 16.9 1.5 9.3 14.2 8.2 3.4 9.3 19.2 1.8 1.0
Multi-response material categories (% of cases)
Pads 64.3 86.1 39.8 89.3 15.8 9.9 85.5 37.4 84.0 33.9 90.7 49.2
Tampons 0.2 1.2 0.3 1.2 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.0 1.9 5.6 0.1 0.1
Cloth 41.9 14.1 47.3 12.0 63.1 63.6 6.5 67.6 7.4 40.4 10.3 59.4
Cotton wool 5.1 7.3 3.0 1.0 15.4 13.7 2.6 1.2 2.2 17.1 0.3 1.4
Paper 0.6 2.2 0.2 3.3 3.9 0.2 17.1 4.6 15.3 25.1 0.2 0.1
Foam 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.3 1.2 8.6 0.5 0.34 0.5 5.1 0.0 0.1
Natural materials 0.3 0.1 2.2 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
None 1.3 0.4 11.1 0.1 3.7 4.3 0.0 1.1 0.3 2.7 1.7 0.9
Bucket 0.2
Other 2 1.2 0.0 4.9 0.8 2.3 3.6 0.1 1.7 4.5 2.7 0.1 0.1

1 Includes foam, natural materials, bucket, paper, and “other” from the original question, or any combination of those materials, and no materials. 2 Materials marked as “other” from the original question.