Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 16;17(8):2744. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082744

Table 2.

Summary of the characteristics of the included studies.

Study Type of Study Participants Sample Size Risk Factor Examined
[22] Cross-sectional study Competitive junior tennis players N = 35, (M = 19, F = 16) Scapulothoracic position, muscle strength, flexibility
[27] Cross-sectional study Competitive adult tennis players N = 59, (M = 31, F = 28) Age-related shoulder/scapular adaptions
[32] Controlled laboratory study Collegiate tennis players N = 16’ (Μ) Racket grip size
[24] Cross-sectional study Competitive adult tennis players N = 55, (Μ) Racket properties
[13] Prospective 2-year study Competitive junior tennis players N = 55, (M = 35, F = 20) Previous injury
[23] Laboratory-based study Competitive junior tennis players N = 51, (M = 29, F = 22) Flexibility and range of motion
[33] Laboratory study Ex-professional senior tennis players N = 10, (M = 9, F = 1) Glenohumeral instability and shoulder impingement
[21] Cross-sectional study Professional and competitive tennis players N = 18, (M = 18) Skills and technique
[34] Laboratory-based study Competitive adult tennis players N = 20, (M = 20) Skill, technique kinetic chain, and previous injury
[29] Laboratory-based study Competitive adult tennis players N= 8, (M = 8) Effect of prolonged tennis to shoulder muscle fatigue
[20] Laboratory-based study Competitive adult tennis players N= 8, (M = 8) Effect of prolonged tennis to shoulder range of motion
[31] Cross-sectional controlled study Competitive senior tennis players N = 18, (M = 17, F = 1) Prolonged tennis may affect shoulder articular cartilage
[28] Cohort study Professional tennis players N = 79, (F = 79) Effect of prolonged tennis on glenohumeral rotation
[30] Randomized controlled clinical trial Collegiate tennis players N = 20, (M = 20) Influence of fatigue on scapular kinematics
[35] Laboratory-based study Competitive adult tennis players N = 8, (M = 8) Scapulothoracic kinematics
[26] Laboratory-based study Competitive adult tennis players N = 8, (M = 8) Racket polar moment of inertia
[36] Cross-sectional study Competitive junior tennis players N = 40, (M = 26, F = 14) Shoulder rotational muscle imbalances
[37] Cross-sectional study Competitive junior tennis players N = 53, (M = 31, F = 22) Correlation between scapular dyskinesia and subacromial space
[25] Cross-sectional study Competitive adult tennis players N = 400, (M = 323, F = 77) Racket grip

N = number of participants; M = male participants; F = female participants.