Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 18;17(8):2804. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082804

Table 3.

Comparison of HRQoL, calculated by MAPPING CHU9D, according to PA.

PA MAPPING CHU9D PA MEAN DIF MEDIANS DIF p* p**
1 Median (IR)
Mean (SD)
0.76 (0.07)
0.75 (0.09)
2 −0.01 −0.02 0.005 0.206
3 −0.03 −0.05 0.002
4 −0.03 −0.05 0.001
2 Median (IR)
Mean (SD)
0.77 (0.07)
0.77 (0.11)
1 0.01 0.02 0.005 0.206
3 −0.01 −0.02 0.206
4 −0.02 −0.03 0.083
3 Median (IR)
Mean (SD)
0.78 (0.06)
0.80 (0.08)
1 0.03 0.05 0.005 0.002
2 0.01 0.02 0.206
4 −0.01 −0.01 0.537
4 Median (IR)
Mean (SD)
0.78 (0.06)
0.80 (0.09)
1 0.03 0.05 0.005 0.001
2 0.02 0.03 0.083
3 0.01 0.01 0.537

* Kruskal–Wallis global for a p = 0.05, using as an answer, the HRQoL according to KS9, and as a factor, the level of physical activity PA: 1 (The child does not exercise.), 2 (The child does some occasional physical activity or sport), 3 (The child does physical activity several times a month), or 4 (The child does sports or physical training several times a week). ** Mann–Whitney post hoc U analysis with Bonferroni correction factor having p = 0.017. MAPPING CHU9D: derived variable that estimates the HRQoL (values 0–1). PA: frequency of physical activity (values 1–4). MEAN DIF: difference between the average values of MAPPING CHU9D for each PA level. MEDIANS DIF: difference between the medians of MAPPING CHU9D for each PA level.