Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Diagn Ther. 2020 Feb;24(1):95–101. doi: 10.1007/s40291-019-00429-7

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Fragment sizes of dsDNA, ssDNA and pure-ssDNA libraries. (a). Representative size distribution of different library preparation methods. ssDNA and pure-ssDNA methods showed significant enrichment of sub-100bp fragments. (b). ssDNA libraries showed 6–21 bp smaller fragment size than their matched dsDNA libraries. The size of pure-ssDNA libraries was 12–13 bp smaller in PS1 and PS2 than dsDNA libraries but similar to dsDNA libraries in PS6 to PS10