Skip to main content
. 2020 May 11;20:63. doi: 10.1186/s12902-020-0540-7

Table 3.

Comparison of clinical parameters between low-risk polyps group and high-risk polyps group in prediabetes [±s, n (%)]

Variable Low-risk polyps group (n = 90) High-risk polyps group (n = 158) P-value
Sex (male) (%) 43 (47.8) 98 (62.5) 0.029
Age (year) 54.7 ± 10.9 58.1 ± 12.4 0.012
BMI (kg/m2) 23.6 ± 3.3 24.9 ± 3.6 0.046
WHR 0.88 ± 0.08 0.92 ± 0.09 0.032
SBP (mm Hg) 122 ± 16 123 ± 15 0.876
DBP (mm Hg) 76 ± 14 77 ± 12 0.913
FPG (mmol/L) 5.8 ± 0.4 5.9 ± 0.6 0.882
2hPG (mmol/L) 8.8 ± 0.9 10.3 ± 0.6 < 0.001
TG (mmol/L) 1.61 ± 0.89 1.68 ± 0.91 0.621
TCH (mmol/L) 5.02 ± 0.88 5.17 ± 0.72 0.705
FINS (mIU/L) 12.62 ± 5.93 18.98 ± 8.23 0.047
HOMA-IR 3.38 ± 1.76 5.02 ± 2.28 0.034
Adiponectin (mg/L) 7.4 ± 3.5 3.7 ± 2.9 < 0.001
Visfatin (mg/L) 12.1 ± 5.6 14.9 ± 7.7 0.351
Leptin (ng/ml) 24.6 ± 10.3 31.3 ± 13.5 0.289
Resistin (ng/ml) 7.9 ± 1.8 9.7 ± 2.2 0.402
Current smoking (%) 18 (20.0) 77 (48.7) 0.023
Regular alcohol drinking (%) 32 (35.6) 65 (41.1) 0.386
Regular exercise (%) 26 (28.9) 27 (17.1) 0.433
Regular vegetables consumption (%) 27 (30.0) 42 (26.6) 0.564
Family history of colon cancer (%) 5 (5.6) 18 (11.4) 0.035

Data are presented mean ± standard deviations or numbers (%); Differences between the two groups compared using the independent sample t-test to analyze the normally distributed continous variables, using the Mann-Whitney U test to analyze the abnormally distributed continous variables. And using x2 test to analyze the count data