Skip to main content
. 2020 May 11;20:405. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06895-1

Table 2.

Characteristics of 72 patients according to the respectability classification

Factors R (n = 29) BR (n = 23) LA (n = 20) p value
Age (years) 72 (44–87) 70 (51–80) 70 (45–85) 0.725
Gender (male / female) 15 / 14 12 / 11 16 / 4 0.094
Patients with biliary drainage (%) 25 (86.2%) 16 (69.6%) 17 (85.0%) 0.270
Initial blood examination
 Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) 2.03 (0.97–8.15) 2.21 (1.14–7.90) 3.15 (0.98–10.59) 0.083
 Prognostic nuritional index (PNI) 42.5 (33.9–55.6) 44.6 (35.2–56.2) 42.4 (32.7–54.8) 0.566
 CEA (mg/dl) 3.6 (0.7–38.4) 3.6 (0.9–16.3) 4.1 (1.6–65.7) 0.625
  CA19–9 (U/ml) 100.7 (7.0–7898) 98.4 (1.0–9066) 208 (5.2–5265) 0.889
Initial clinical staging
 Patients with cT4 (%) 2 (6.9%) 16 (69.6%) 17 (85.0%) < 0.001*
 Patients with clinical LN metastasis (%) 7 (24.1%) 7 (30.4%) 10 (50.0%) 0.158
Patients with neoadjuvant GS therapy (%) 8 (27.6%) 21 (91.3%) 18 (90.0%) < 0.001*
 Completion rate of initial 2 cycles (%) 7/8 (87.5%) 20/21 (95.2%) 16/18 (88.9%)
  Median relative dose intensity of S-1 (%) 100% 100% 100%
  Median relative dose intensity of G (%) 101% 87.4% 81.8%
 Patients with adverse events (%) 7 (87.5%) 14 (66.7%) 14 (77.8%)
  Toxicity grade 1/2 4 2 6
  Toxicity grade 3/4 (grade 3 cholangitis) 3 (2) 12 (10) 8 (6)
Patients with resection (%) 26 (89.7%) 17 (73.9%) 6 (30.0%) < 0.001**

R resectable, BR borderline resectable, LA locally advanced * R vs. BR, UR, **R, BR vs. UR

CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19–9 carbohydrate antigen 19–9, GS gemcitabine plus S-1, LN lymph node, G gemcitabine