Skip to main content
. 2020 May 12;20:148. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01293-0

Table 3.

Univariate logistic regression analysis of the risk factors for local recurrence

Univariate
P value OR (95% CI)
Size
 0–2 cm vs. > 2 cm 0.002 4.037 (1.661–9.809)
Color change
 Redness 0.716 1.148 (0.546–2.416)
Gross type
 Elevated 0.292
 Elevated vs. flat 0.871 0.913 (0.303–2.753)
 Elevated vs. depressed 0.710 1.223 (0.423–3.541)
 Elevated vs. nodularity 0.117 2.239 (0.817–6.135)
Atrophic change
 Closed type 0.450 2.170 (0.290–16.211)
Intestinal metaplasia
 Yes 0.220 1.590 (0.758–3.337)
Helicobacter pylori
 Yes 0.111 0.196 (0.026–1.453)
Endoscopic biopsy
 LGD vs. HGD 0.113 2.024 (0.846–4.842)
En bloc resection
 Yes 0.011 0.354 (0.160–0.787)
Complete resection
 Yes 0.001 0.164 (0.059–0.461)
Complication
 Yes 0.998 0.000
Pathologic result of post-procedure
 Othera 0.424
 Other vs. LGD 0.983 0.978 (0.127–7.541)
 Other vs. HGD 0.503 2.070 (0.246–17.414)
 Other vs. adenocarcinoma 0.993 1.010 (0.102–10.036)
Procedure
 ESD 0.028 0.304 (0.105–0.882)

CI Confidence intervals, EMR Endoscopic mucosal resection, ESD Submucosal dissection, HGD High-grade dysplasia, LGD Low-grade dysplasia, OR Odds ratio

aOther includes the cases with no residual adenomatous lesions, regenerative atypia, or chronic gastritis with intestinal metaplasia on pathological examination after endoscopic resection