Skip to main content
. 2020 May 11;11:26. doi: 10.1186/s13293-020-00299-3

Table 1.

Associations between fetal sex and maternal pregnancy outcomes

First author Statistical analyses Subgroups Tendency towards which sex (M/F/=) Crude effect estimate (95% CI) p value Covariate adjustment Adjusted effect estimate (95% CI) p value
Gestational hypertension
 Andersen et al. 2016 [15] Logistic regression F 0..69 (0..38–1..25) 0.22
 Baibergenova et al. 2006 [16] Logistic regression F 1.06 (0.55–2.50) 0.87
 Campbell et al. 1983 [17] Logistic regression M 1.18 (1.09–1.27) < 0.0001
 Chien et al. 2011 [18] Logistic regression M 0.97 (0.96–0.98) < 0.0001
 Engel et al. 2008 [19] Chi-square Total M 1.04 (0.94–1.14) 0.46
Mild M 1.04 (0.94–1.16) 0.44
Moderate F 0.99 (0.80–1.24) 0.95
Severe F 0.94 (0.62–1.42) 0.76
 Favilli et al. 2013 [20] Logistic regression F 1.69 (0.63–4.57) 0.43 Maternal age > 40 years, weight gain, BMI, gestational diabetes 0.98 (0.43–2.25) 0.97
 Hou et al. 2014 [21] Logistic regression F 0.97 (0.91–1.02) 0.25
 Juberg et al. 1976 [22] Chi-square M 0.03
Li et al. 2016 [23] Logistic regression F 0.97 (0.78–1.21) 0.79
 Makhseed et al. 1998 [24] Logistic regression Total M 1.01 (0.86–1.20) 0.87
Primiparous F 0.87 (0.65–1.17) 0.36
Multiparous M 1.09 (0.89–1.33) 0.42
 Persson et al. 2014 [25] Logistic regression Healthy population M 1.03 (1.01–1.06) 0.003
Gestational diabetes M 1.08 (0.93–1.26) 0.31
Diabetes mellitus type I F 0.93 (0.79–1.09) 0.35
Diabetes mellitus type II F 0.83 (0.44–1.57) 0.56
 Ricart et al. 2009 [76] Logistic regression M 1.22 (0.91–1.63) 0.19
 Sheiner et al. 2004 [26] Logistic regression = 1.00 (0.95–1.05) 0.96
 Shiozaki et al. 2011 [27] Logistic regression F 0.88 (0.83–0.92) < 0.0001
 Sykes et al. 2014 [77 Logistic regression M 1.33 (0.67–2.63) 0.42
 Tundidor et al. 2012 [28] Relative risk F 0.81 (0.55–1.20) NR
 Valvi et al. 2017 [109] Logistic regression M 1.03 (0.58–1.85) 0.91
 Verburg et al. 2016 [29] Relative risk Total M 1.05 (1.03–1.07) NR
25–29 weeks F 0.69 (0.58–0.81) NR
30–33 weeks F 0.87 (0.79–0.97) NR
34–36 weeks F 0.93 (0.87–0.98) NR
37–39 weeks M 1.06 (1.04–1.09) NR
40–42 weeks M 1.07 (1.04–1.11) NR
 Zheng et al. 2016 [30] Logistic regression F 0.54 (0.26–1.14) 0.11
Pre-eclampsia
 Aibar et al. 2012 [31] Logistic regression F 0.99 (0.65–1.49) 0.94
 Aliyu et al. 2012 [32] Logistic regression F 0.90 (0.79–1.03) 0.12
 Andersen et al. 2016 [15] Logistic regression Total F 0.95 (0.69–1.31) 0.76
Preterm F 1.04 (0.42–2.56) 0.94
Term M 1.22 (0.85–1.74) 0.29
 Basso et al. 2001 [33] Logistic regression M 0.94 (0.92–0.97) < 0.05
 Brettel et al. 2008 [34] Logistic regression F 1.17 (1.01–1.35) 0.03
 Campbell et al. 1983 [17] Logistic regression F 1.08 (0.94–1.24) 0.3
 Choong et al. 1995 [35] Logistic regression F 1.45 (1.22–1.71) < 0.0001
 Chu et al. 2014 [36] Logistic regression M 0.60 (0.19–1.83) 0.39
 Hadar et al. 2017 [37] Logistic regression F 0.99 (0.68–1.43) 0.95
 Hou et al. 2014 [21] Logistic regression F 0.95 (0.88–1.02) 0.13
 Juberg et al. 1976 [22] Chi-square M 0.06
 Khalil et al. 2013 [38] Logistic regression Total M 1.04 (0.91–1.19) 0.57
Preterm F 1.53 (1.07–2.20) 0.02
Term M 1.08 (0.93–1.25) 0.31
Postterm M 3.46 (1.40–8.53) 0.007
 Lao et al. 2011 [39] Logistic regression F 0.92 (0.81–1.06) 0.26
 Lao et al. 2017 [40] Logistic regression M 1.56 (1.41–1.73) <0.0001
 Li et al. 2016 [23] Logistic regression F 0.66 (0.45–0.98) 0.04
 Lisonkova et al. 2013 [41] Cox regression < 34 weeks M 1.10 (1.07–1.14) NR NR 1.10 (1.06–1.14) NR
> 34 weeks M 1.10 (1.07–1.14) NR NR 1.10 (1.06–1.14) NR
 Liu et al. 2016 [42] Logistic regression Total 0.96 (0.88–1.04) 0.31
Preterm 1.15 (1.00–1.32) 0.046
 Makhseed et al. 1998 [24] Logistic regression Total F 0.92 (0.68–1.24) 0.57
Nulliparous F 0.74 (0.49–1.10) 0.13
Multiparous M 1.20 (0.76–1.90) 0.43
 Masoumi et al. 2017 [43] Logistic regression Total M 1.09 (0.90–1.31) 0.40
Severe M 1.43 (0.81–2.51) 0.21
 Morsing et al. 2018 [44] Logistic regression F 0.80 (0.59–1.09) 0.16
 Myers et al. 2015 [45] Logistic regression = 0.94 (0.65–1.36) 0.74
 Peled et al. 2013 [46] Logistic regression M 1.79 (0.42–7.56) 0.43
 Persson et al. 2014 [25] Logistic regression Healthy population M 1.03 (1.01–1.06) 0.003
Gestational diabetes M 1.08 (0.93–1.26) 0.31
Diabetes mellitus type I F 0.93 (0.79–1.09) 0.35
Diabetes mellitus type II F 0.83 (0.44–1.57) 0.56
 Quiñones et al. 2005 [47] Logistic regression M 1.15 (0.77–1.70) 0.5
 Reynolds et al. 2012 [48] Logistic regression Total F 0.85 (0.71–1.02) 0.08
Preterm F 1.25 (0.79–1.97) 0.34
Term F 0.86 (0.71–1.04) 0.13
 Roy et al. 2015 [49] Logistic regression Total M 1.28 (0.72–2.29) 0.4
Preterm M 0.77 (0.33–1.81) 0.55
Term M 1.28 (0.66–2.46) 0.46
 Sharifzadeh et al. 2012 [50] F 0.88 (0.33–2.35) 0.8
 Sheiner et al. 2004 [26] Logistic regression = 1.00 (0.95–1.05) 0.96
 Shiozaki et al. 2011 [27] Chi-square Pre-eclampsia F 0.84 (0.79–0.89) < 0.001
Pre-eclampsia with fetal death M 1.21 (0.70–1.48) 0.95
Severe pre-eclampsia F 1.21 (1.10–1.33) 0.001
Severe pre-eclampsia with fetal death F 1.14 (0.67–1.93) 0.63
 Sykes et al. 2014 [77] Logistic regression M 1.27 (0.64–2.51) 0.49
 Taylor et al. 2018 [51] Logistic regression F 0.94 (0.67–1.30) 0.70
 Taylor et al. 2018 [51] Logistic regression PE overall F 0.89 (0.64–1.24) 0.69
Term (> 37 weeks) F 0.92 (0.65–1.30) 0.63
Preterm (<37 weeks) F 0.72 (0.37–1.39) 0.32
Very preterm (<34 weeks) F 0.38 (0.13–1.07) 0.07
 Toivanen et al. 1970 [52] Logistic regression M 1.20 (1.06–1.37) 0.005
 Trudel et al. 2015 [53] Logistic regression M 1.01 (0.95–1.07) 0.82
 Vatten et al. 2004 [54] Logistic regression Total M 1.05 (1.03–1.07) < 0.0001
Preterm (< 37 weeks) F 1.17 (1.11–1.22) < 0.0001
Term (37–42 weeks) M 1.06 (1.04–1.08 < 0.0001
Postterm (> 42 weeks) M 1.07 (0.96–1.18) 0.23
25–29 weeks F 1.55 (1.31–1.83) < 0.0001
30–33 weeks F 1.33 (1.21–1.46) < 0.0001
34–36 wls F 1.07 (1.01–1.14) 0.03
37–39 weeks F 0.98 (0.85–1.01) 0.18
40–42 weeks M 1.10 (1.07–1.13) < 0.0001
 Verburg et al. 2016 [29] Relative risk Total M 1.05 (1.03–1.07) NR
25–29 weeks F 0.69 (0.58–0.81) NR
30–33 weeks F 0.87 (0.79–0.97) NR
34–36 weeks F 0.93 (0.87–0.98) NR
37–39 weeks M 1.06 (1.04–1.09) NR
40–42 weeks M 1.07 (1.04–1.11) NR
 Wandabwa et al. 2010 [79] Logistic regression F 0.65 (0.45–0.95) 0.03
 Weinberg et al. 2017 [55] Logistic regression Total M 1.01 (0.98–1.04) 0.71
Term (> 37 weeks) M 1.05 (1.01–1.08) 0.01
Preterm (<37 weeks) F 0.89 (0.84–0.94) 0.0001
 Zheng et al. 2016 [30] Logistic regression Total F 0.49 (0.27–0.89) 0.02
Mild F 0.65 (0.30–1.43) 0.29
Severe F 2.60 (1.18–5.73) 0.02
Eclampsia
 Aibar et al. 2012 [31] Logistic regression M 1.54 (0.50–4.72) 0.45
 Aliyu et al. 2012 [32] Logistic regression F 0.92 (0.42–2.01) 0.83
 Campbell et al. 1983 [17] Logistic regression F 0.89 (0.35–2.32) 0.82
 Chien et al. 2011 [18] Logistic regression = 1.00 (0.97–1.04) 0.89
 Hou et al. 2014 [21] Chi-square M 0.13
 Llopez-Lera et al. 1990 [82] Chi-square M < 0.05
 Persson et al. 2014 [25] Logistic regression Healthy population M 1.03 (1.01–1.06) 0.003
Gestational diabetes M 1.08 (0.93–1.26) 0.31
Diabetes mellitus type I F 0.93 (0.79–1.09) 0.35
Diabetes mellitus type II F 0.83 (0.44–1.57) 0.56
 Wandabwa et al. 2010 [79] Logistic regression F 0.65 (0.45–0.95) 0.03
Gestational diabetes
 Aibar et al. 2012 [31] Logistic regression M 1.21 (1.06–1.37) 0.0034
 Breschi et al. 1993 [56] Logistic regression F 0.96 (0.36–2.52) 0.93
 Cosson et al. 2016 [57] Logistic regression = 1.00 (0.93–1.08) 0.96
 Ehrlich et al. 2012 [58] Logistic regression M 1.02 (0.99–1.05) NR Maternal ethnicity 1.02 (0.99–1.05) NR
Maternal ethnicity. education and age 1.02 (0.99–1.05) NR
 Engel et al. 2008 [19] Logistic regression M 1.07 (0.85–1.36) 0.54
 Favili et al. 2013 [20] Logistic regression M 2.36 (0.58–9.61) 0.37 Maternal age > 40 years, BMI, weight gain, gestational hypertension 0.95 (0.37–2.46) 0.92
 Heckbert et al. 1988 [59] Logistic regression F 0.97 (0.77–1.21) 0.79
 Hou et al. 2014 [21] Logistic regression M 1.01 (0.96–1.07) 0.61
 Janssen et al. 1996 [60] Logistic regression M 1.02 (0.96–1.08) 0.5
 Kale et al. 2005 [61] Logistic regression M 1.64 (1.12–2.40) 0.01
 Khalil et al. 2013 [38] Logistic regression M 1.41 (1.15–1.72) < 0.001
 Lao et al. 2011 [39] Logistic regression M 1.05 (0.99–1.12 0.12
 Lao et al. 2017 [40] Logistic regression M 1.06 (1.01–1.11) 0.08
 Lawlor et al. 2009 [84] Logistic regression M 1.61 (0.92–2.81) 0.09
 Liu et al. 2016 [42] Logistic regression M 1.08 (1.00–1.16) 0.048
 Macaulay et al. 2018 [86] Logistic regression M 1.16 (0.73–1.84) 0.53
 Oken et al. 2016 [62] Logistic regression M 1.39 (0.81–2.36) 0.23
 Okereke et al. 2002 [63] Logistic regression M 1.39 (0.81–2.36) 0.23
 Peled et al. 2013 [46] Logistic regression M 3.24 (0.65–16.22) 0.15
 Retnakaran et al. 2015 [64] Logistic regression M 1.03 (1.00–1.05) 0.047
 Retnakaran et al. 2015 [64] Logistic regression M 1.24 (0.92–1.67) 0.16
 Ricart et al. 2009 [76] Logistic regression M 1.05 (0.91–1.22) 0.17
 Sheiner et al. 2004 [26] Logistic regression M 1.07 (1.01–1.12) 0.01
 Spellacy et al. 1985 [65] Chi-square M NS
 Strutz et al. 2018 [66] Logistic regression M 1.80 (0.40–8.18) 0.45
 Trudel et al. 2015 [53] Logistic regression F 0.96 (0.90–1.04) 0.32
 Verburg et al. 2016 [29 RR M 1.04 (1.01–1.07) NR
 Xiao et al. 2014 [67] Logistic regression M 1.29 (0.58–2.89) 0.53
Placental abruption
 Aliyu et al. 2012 [32] Logistic regression F 0.98 (0.87–1.12) 0.8
 Brettel et al. 2008 [34] Logistic regression M 1.29 (0.97–1.71) 0.08
 Engel et al. 2008 [19] Logistic regression F 0.53 (0.28–0.99) 0.049
 Hou et al. 2014 [21] Logistic regression F 0.98 (0.83–1.15) 0.76
 Jakobovits et al. 1988 [68] Chi-square Total M NS
17–20 years M < 0.001
21–25 years M < 0.01
26–30 years F NS
31–35 years M < 0.05
36–40 years M < 0.05
41–42 years = NS
 Lopez-Llera et al. 1990 [82] Logistic regression M 0.94 (0.54–1.66) 0.84
 Peled et al. 2013 [46] Logistic regression M 2.90 (0.76–11.03) 0.12
 Raissanen et al. 2013 [110 Logistic regression Total M 1.19 (1.12–1.26) < 0.0001
Nulliparous M 1.23 (1.12–1.36) < 0.0001 NR 1.36 (1.23–1.51)
Multiparous M 1.16 (1.08–1.26) 0.001 NR 1.38 (1.27–1.50)
 Schildberger et al. 2016 [69] Logistic regression F 0.84 (0.81–0.87) < 0.0001
 Sheiner et al. 2002 [70] Logistic regression F 0.98 (0.78–1.24) 0.88
 Sheiner et al. 2004 [26] Logistic regression M 1.15 (0.89–1.49) 0.28
 Tikkanen et al. 2013 [90] Logistic regression M 1.18 (1.11–1.25) < 0.0001
 Wandabwa et al. 2005 [91] Logistic regression M 2.20 (1.20–4.90) < 0.01 Distance to hospital. age, type of house, hypertension, previous caesarean section, previous stillbirth 1.90 (1.00–3.80) NR
 Weissmann–Brenner et al. 2015 [71] Logistic regression Total M 1.20 (0.77–1.87) 0.42
Age < 40 years M 1.14 (0.73–1.79) 0.56
Age > 40 years M 5.08 (0.24–106.0) 0.29
Post-partum hemorrhage
 Favili et al. 2013 [20 Logistic regression Total M 1.12 (0.34–3.72) 0.85
Age ≥ 40 years M 2.10 (0.40–11.01) 0.38
Age < 40 years F 0.35 (0.04–3.37) 0.36
 Weissmann–Brenner et al. 2015 [71] Logistic regression Total M 1.20 (0.88–1.65) 0.25
Age ≥ 40 years M 1.16 (0.84–1.61) 0.35
Age < 40 years M 4.07 (0.45–36.5) 0.21
 Liu et al. 2016 [42] Logistic regression F 0.91 (0.83–0.99) 0.0046
Miscarriage
 Byrne et al. 1987 [72] Risk ratio Total M < 0.05
Morphological normal M < 0.05
Morphological abnormal F > 0.05
 Cheng et al. 2014 [73] Risk ratio F < 0.001
 Del Fabro et al. 2011 [74] Risk ratio Total F < 0.05
4–10 weeks F < 0.001
11–15 weeks F 0.07
16–20 weeks F 0.06