Table 5.
Nested random effects models of association between Chamas participation and facility delivery controlling for prenatal care location (n = 307)a
| Model variance estimates | Random Effects Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Null | Unadjusted | Adjusted | |
| σu2 (SE) | 0.30 (0.24) | 0.51 (0.40) | 0.44 (0.39) |
| ρ (SE) | 0.08 (0.06) | 0.14 (0.09) | 0.12 (0.09) |
| p-value□ | 0.01 | < 0.01 | 0.01 |
| −2 log likelihood | 330.23 | 291.10 | 267.40 |
| Covariates | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) |
| Chamasparticipation | |||
| Did not participate in Chamas | N/A | – | – |
| Participated | N/A | 6.40 (3.44, 11.76)ỻ | 5.60 (2.91, 10.80) †† |
| Age (years) | N/A | N/A | 1.00 (0.92, 1.08) |
| Education level | |||
| None-some primary | N/A | N/A | – |
| Completed primary | N/A | N/A | 1.22 (0.54, 2.74) |
| Some-completed secondary | N/A | N/A | 3.28 (0.73, 14.75) |
| Employment | |||
| Housewife (unemployed) | N/A | N/A | – |
| Self-employed/Agricultural Worker/Other | N/A | N/A | 1.47 (0.76, 2.85) |
| Marital Status | |||
| Single/Separated/Divorced | N/A | N/A | – |
| Married | N/A | N/A | 1.35 (0.44, 4.15) |
| Parity | |||
| Primiparous | N/A | N/A | – |
| Multiparous | N/A | N/A | 1.03 (0.15, 6.95) |
| Prior facility delivery□ | |||
| No | N/A | N/A | – |
| Yes | N/A | N/A | 4.16 (2.09, 8.27) †† |
aComplete cases only; n = 19 participants missing data on primary outcome or covariate
□Likelihood ratio test, ρ = 0
††Significant p < 0.001