Table 4.
Trajectory group | n | Estimated (%, 95 CI) | Assigned (%) | APP (%) | OCC | BIC (n = 15,694) | BIC (n = 491) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-group model | − 7491.93 | − 7459.01 | |||||
1 | 148 | 29.4 (25.4–33.4) | 29.0 | 93.6 | 14.6 | ||
2 | 362 | 70.6 (66.6–74.6) | 71.0 | 97.0 | 32.3 | ||
3-group model | − 7225.88 | − 7175.65 | |||||
1 | 314 | 60.1 (55.8–64.4) | 61.6 | 94.6 | 35.6 | ||
2 | 114 | 22.4 (18.8–26.0) | 22.5 | 91.7 | 22.4 | ||
3 | 82 | 16.1 (12.9–19.3) | 16.0 | 92.9 | 26.6 | ||
4-group model | − 7131.09 | − 7063.53 | |||||
1 | 66 | 14.6 (11.5–17.7) | 12.9 | 87.7 | 21.4 | ||
2 | 293 | 54.8 (50.5–59.1) | 57.5 | 91.5 | 32.3 | ||
3 | 108 | 21.9 (18.3–25.5) | 21.2 | 89.7 | 26.1 | ||
4 | 43 | 8.7 (6.3–11.1) | 8.4 | 93.0 | 39.3 | ||
5-group model | − 7083.56 | − 6998.68 | |||||
1 | 203 | 37.2 (33.0–41.4) | 39.8 | 86.4 | 25.4 | ||
2 | 148 | 30.2 (26.2–34.2) | 29.0 | 85.0 | 22.7 | ||
3 | 47 | 9.5 (7.0–12.0) | 9.2 | 89.5 | 34.1 | ||
4 | 68 | 14.3 (11.3–17.3) | 13.3 | 86.5 | 25.6 | ||
5 | 44 | 8.7 (6.3–11.1) | 8.6 | 91.5 | 43.1 | ||
6-group model | − 7081.03 | − 6978.82 | |||||
1 | 209 | 36.1 (31.9–40.3) | 41.0 | 82.4 | 23.4 | ||
2 | 44 | 10.7 (8.0–13.4) | 8.6 | 73.2 | 13.6 | ||
3 | 110 | 22.4 (18.8–26.0) | 21.6 | 82.2 | 23.0 | ||
4 | 71 | 15.1 (12.0–18.2) | 13.9 | 87.1 | 33.7 | ||
5 | 32 | 7.0 (4.8–9.2) | 6.3 | 90.9 | 49.8 | ||
6 | 44 | 8.7 (6.3–11.1) | 8.6 | 91.5 | 53.7 | ||
Final modela | − 7154.16 | − 7105.65 | |||||
Non-compliers | 228 | 42.5 (38.2–46.8) | 44.7 | 88.8 | 23.8 | ||
Decliners | 85 | 18.5 (15.1–21.9) | 16.7 | 86.3 | 18.9 | ||
Compliers | 44 | 9.0 (6.5–11.5) | 8.6 | 94.0 | 47.0 | ||
Screen-Compliers | 153 | 30.0 (26.0–34.0) | 30.0 | 89.0 | 24.3 |
Abbreviations: APP Average posterior probability of classification, OCC Odds of correct classification, BIC Bayesian information criterion
aVariations between the distribution of participants in trajectory group results and final model results to facilitate trajectory group presentation