TABLE 3.
Model | Patients Tested | Members, No. | Correctly Classified, % | Classification Details | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
a: IBS vs UCAs | IBS | UCA | |||
R2Y: 0.85 | IBS | 14 | 92.86 | 13 | 1 |
Q2: 0.84 | UCA | 15 | 100 | 0 | 15 |
x-variables: 4 | Total | 29 | 96.55 | 13 | 16 |
Fisher’s proba: 2.1 × 10–7 | |||||
b: IBS vs UCR + IBS | IBS | UCR + IBS | |||
R2Y: 0.85 | IBS | 14 | 100 | 14 | 0 |
Q2: 0.83 | UCR + IBS | 9 | 100 | 0 | 9 |
x-variables: 4 | Total | 23 | 100 | 14 | 9 |
Fisher’s prob: 1.2 × 10–6 | |||||
c: UCR + IBS vs UCAs | UCA | UCR + IBS | |||
R2Y: 0.60 | UCR + IBS | 9 | 44.44 | 5 | 4 |
Q2: 0.27 | UCA | 15 | 93.33 | 14 | 1 |
x-variables: 36 | Total | 24 | 75 | 19 | 5 |
Fisher’s prob: 0.047 |
aFisher’s exact probability test.