Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 4;39(13):1871–1883. doi: 10.1002/sim.8519

Figure 4.

SIM-8519-FIG-0004-c

Differences between the theoretical power for the “Girls on the go!” program without any decay in between‐period correlations and participant errors and for models assuming decaying between‐period correlations and/or autoregressive participant errors for differing core group proportions (left) and p of in‐for‐p sampling schemes (right) [Colour figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]