Table 2. The relationship between parental lifestyle factors and dietary attitudes.
| Interest in Shokuiku | Consideration of nutrient balance | |||||
| No or do not know n (%) |
Univariate OR (95% CI) |
Multivariate OR (95% CI) |
Rarely or no n (%) |
Univariate OR (95% CI) |
Multivariate OR (95% CI) |
|
| Family members | ||||||
| Only parent(s) | 121 (11.3) | 0.93 (0.68–1.28) | 0.88 (0.64–1.22) | 192 (17.9) | 1.15 (0.87–1.51) | 1.08 (0.82–1.44) |
| Not only Parent(s) | 67 (12.0) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 89 (15.9) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Maternal employment status | ||||||
| Employed | 161 (11.6) | 1.04 (0.67–1.60) | 0.97 (0.63–1.51) | 240 (17.3) | 1.02 (0.71–1.46) | 0.97 (0.66–1.41) |
| Not employed | 27 (11.2) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 41 (17.0) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Family affluence | ||||||
| Affluent | 124 (10.1) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 185 (15.1) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Not affluent | 64 (15.8) | 1.66 (1.20–2.30)* | 1.46 (1.05–2.04)* | 96 (23.6) | 1.74 (1.32–2.30)* | 1.52 (1.14–2.03)* |
| Paternal BHPS | ||||||
| Good (6–7) | 27 (7.6) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 45 (12.6) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Moderate (4–5) | 75 (10.5) | 1.44 (0.91–2.28) | 1.23 (0.77–1.97) | 97 (13.6) | 1.09 (0.75–1.59) | 0.89 (0.60–1.32) |
| Poor (0–3) | 86 (15.2) | 2.19 (1.39–3.45)* | 1.53 (0.94–2.48) | 139 (24.6) | 2.26 (1.56–3.25)* | 1.47 (0.99–2.17) |
| Maternal BHPS | ||||||
| Good (6–7) | 32 (7.2) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 39 (8.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Moderate (4–5) | 92 (10.3) | 1.48 (0.97–2.25) | 1.33 (0.86–2.04) | 148 (16.6) | 2.07 (1.42–3.00)* | 1.85 (1.26–2.71)* |
| Poor (0–3) | 64 (21.8) | 3.61 (2.29–5.68)* | 2.95 (1.82–4.78)* | 94 (32.1) | 4.92 (3.26–7.41)* | 3.86 (2.50–5.96)* |
BHPS, Breslow’s seven health practice score; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
In multivariate model, all of the variables were simultaneously entered.
*P < 0.05.