Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 27;27(2):256–267. doi: 10.1007/s10880-019-09659-7

Table 2.

Results of the MMPI-2-RF Validity Scales of patients with Noonan syndrome (NS, n = 18) and healthy controls (HC, n = 18)

MMPI-2-RF Validity Scales Median raw scores (range) Mean uniform or linear T-scores (SD) U z p r
NS HC NS HC
VRIN-r 4 (0–7) 3.5 (0–6) 53.94 (11.55) 50.67 (10.30) 133.00 − .93 .37 − .16
TRIN-r 12 (9–12) 11 (8–13) 55.39 (8.13) 51.00 (10.24) 131.50 − 1.02 .34 − .17
F-r 4.5 (1–16) 2.5 (0–10) 66.56 (18.79) 55.17 (13.34) 96.00 − 2.10 .04 − .35
Fp-r 2 (0–6) 1 (0–3) 54.89 (12.48) 51.11 (8.32) 137.00 − .81 .44 − .14
Fs-r 2 (0–9) 1.5 (0–3) 61.17 (19.75) 52.83 (7.78) 130.50 − 1.02 .32 − .17
FBS-r 14 (4–22) 10 (6–17) 68.67 (15.66) 57.33 (8.50) 84.50 − 2.46 .01 − .41
L-r 4 (1–10) 4 (1–9) 47.94 (9.08) 47.00 (10.31) 147.00 − .48 .65 − .08
K-r 6 (1–14) 7 (1–13) 43.94 (14.20) 47.61 (12.53) 190.5 .91 .37 .15
RBS-r 10* (4–16) 7* (3–12) 96.00 − 2.10 .04 − .35

VRIN-r Variable Response Inconsistency, TRIN-r True Response Inconsistency, F-r Infrequent Responses, Fp-r Infrequent Psychopathology Responses, Fs-r Infrequent Somatic Responses, FBS-r Symptom Validity, L-r Uncommon Virtues, K-r Adjustment Validity, RBS-r Response Bias Scale, U Mann–Whitney’s U statistic, z z-score, r effect size estimate

*No normative data were available for the RBS-r, although both scores were below the cut-off score of 17 indicative for exaggeration of memory complaints (Gervais et al., 2010)