Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 26;59(5):591–603. doi: 10.1007/s40262-019-00831-8

Table 4.

Parameter estimates of the base model, final model, and bootstrap analysis

Parameter Base model (RSE %) [shrinkage] Final model (RSE %) [shrinkage] Starting dose model (RSE %) [shrinkage]
tlag (h) FIX 0.41 0.41 0.41
ka (L/h) 2.1 (19) 1.7 (11) 1.85 (24)
CL/F (L/h/70 kg) 37.0 (6) 36.6 (12) 34.5 (6)
V1/F (L/70 kg) 560 (12) 496 (22) 540 (12)
Q/F (L/h) 27.4 (16) 31.7 (19) 28.5 (12)
V2/F (L/70 kg) 1600 (13) 1270 (13) 1660 (17)
Allometric scaling on CL 0.57 (10) 0.62 (20) 0.56 (9)
Covariate effect on CL
 CYP3A5*1/*1 or *1/*3 1.4 1.5
 Hematocrit (L/L) − 0.60
 Creatinine (µmol/L) − 0.1
IIV (%)

 CL/F

 V1/F

 V2/F

 ka

47.2 (8) [4]

89.0 (12) [11]

92.1 (15) [20]

172 (10) [23]

42.1 (10) [5]

99.6 (12) [10]

85.2 (15) [22]

183 (11) [20]

42.3 (11) [3]

93.0 (12) [8]

89.3 (15) [19]

178 (10) [22]

IOV (%)
 CL/F 20.7 (9) 20.1 (20) 20.1 (10)
Residual variability
 Additional

  Immunoassay

  LC–MS/MS

0.77

0.94

1.27

0.87

1.01

0.96

 Proportional

  Immunoassay

  LC–MS/MS

0.12

0.23

0.11

0.23

0.12

0.24

CL clearance, CYP cytochrome P450, F bioavailability, IIV inter-individual variability, IOV inter-occasion variability, ka absorption rate constant, LC–MS/MS liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry, Q inter-compartmental clearance, RSE residual standard error, tlag lag time, V1 volume of distribution of the central compartment, V2 volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment