Skip to main content
. 2020 May 12;10:7848. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64671-4

Figure 4.

Figure 4

SI in the control and alternating conditions in Field L2 at 1 s, 3 s, and jittered ISI. (A) MUA. When ISI was fixed (1 s or 3 s) or jittered (0.8–1.2 s), SI in the alternating conditions were not different from the control condition, and SI was significantly smaller than 0. Note that SIs were compared within the same recording sites between the control and alternating condition using the Wilcoxon test and the scale in the y-axis is smaller here than in Fig. 5. (B) SUA showed the same results as MUA. Note that SIs were compared across different units using the Mann-Whitney U test because single-units cannot be held across different recording conditions. Note that some data points in the bottom left figure were cut off to have a proper scale across the three figures. In the statistical analyses, all data points were included.