Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 6;7(2):ENEURO.0460-18.2020. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0460-18.2020

Table 1.

Statistical analyses used within the manuscript

Data structure Type of test Comparison 95% confidence interval
Figure 2A Non-normally distributed Two-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison test Morphine vs vehicle 0.864 to 1.719
Morphine vs gefitinib 0.7783 to 2.011
Morphine vs morphine + gefitinib –2.349 to –1.117
Figure 2B Non-normally distributed Two-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison test Morphine vs vehicle 0.8614 to 1.635
Morphine vs gefitinib 0.7111 to 1.484
Morphine vs morphine + gefitinib –2.034 to –1.223
Figure 2C Non-normally distributed Two-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison test Morphine vs vehicle 0.1181 to 1.828
Morphine vs EGF 0.8573 to 2.567
Figure 3A Non-normally distributed Two-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison test Morphine vs sham –11.35 to –9.522
Morphine vs gefitinib –0.9836 to 0.9314
Morphine vs morphine + gefitinib –8.873 to –6.958
Figure 3B Normally distributed Two-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison test Morphine vs vehicle –1.497 to 1.603
Morphine vs EGF-FC –1.904 to 1.196
Morphine vs morphine + EGF-FC –10.45 to –7.348
Figure 4A Normally distributed Two-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison test Vehicle vs imatinib –1.891 to 2.498
Vehicle vs EGF 6.313 to 10.07
Vehicle vs EGF+ imatinib –6913 to 3.697
Figure 4B Normally distributed Two-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison test Vehicle vs imatinib –1.515 to 1.977
Vehicle vs EGF –1.367 to 2.126
Vehicle vs EGF+ imatinib –1.732 to 1.761
Figure 4C Normally distributed Two-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison test Vehicle vs gefitinib –1.408 to 2.104
Vehicle vs PDGF 4.401 to 7.913
Vehicle vs PDGF+ gefitinib –0.1661 to 3.346
Figure 4D Normally distributed Two-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison test Vehicle vs gefitinib –0.921 to 1.743
Vehicle vs PDGF –0.9921 to 1.536
Vehicle vs PDGF+ gefitinib –0.606 to 2.058