Table 2.
References | Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) | Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): self-reported outcomes | Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) | Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Other bias |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yeh et al. (69) | High | High | High | Low | Low | Low | High: small smaple size/no control group/no homogeneous clinical sample |
Llorèns et al. (70) | High | High | High | Low | Low | Low | High: small sample size/no control group |
White et al. (71) | High | High | High | High | Low | Low | High: small sample size/no control group/only interview assessment |
Ferreira et al. (72) | High | High | High | Low | Low | Low | High: small sample size |
Nijenhuis et al. (73) | High | High | High | Low | Low | Low | High: small sample size/no control group |
Lloréns et al. (74) | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Palacios-Ceña et al. (75) | High | High | High | High | Low | Low | High: small sample size/no control group/only interview assessment |
Houlihan et al. (76) | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Engelhard et al. (77) | High | High | High | Low | Low | Low | High: no control group |
Lai et al. (78) | High | High | High | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Skolasky et al. (79) | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Pitt et al. (80) | High | High | High | Low | High | Low | High: small sample size/no control group |
D'hooghe et al. (81) | High | High | High | Low | Low | Low | High: no control group |
Dennett et al. (82) | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
De Vries et al. (83) | High | High | High | High | Low | Low | High: small sample size/no control group/only interview assessment |
Thomas et al. (84) | High | High | High | High | Low | Low | High: small sample size/no control group/only interview assessment/no homogeneous clinical sample |
Chemtob et al. (85) | High | High | High | High | Low | Low | High: small sample size/only interview assessment |
Ellis et al. (86) | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
High, High risk of bias; Low, Low risk of bias.