Skip to main content
. 2020 May 6;14:359. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00359

TABLE 5.

Results of the ANOVA analysis applied to the mean activity parameters over the 3 weeks of the study.

Variables Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 ANOVA F(1.107) p between weeks (Bonferroni post hoc)
1–2 1–3 2–3
Activity
Mesor 13.48 ± 0.66 15.64 ± 0.63 15.14 ± 0.39 F = 3.84, p = 0.02 0.024 0.019 0.81
Amplitude 7.31 ± 0.33 9.03 ± 0.32 9.13 ± 0.28 F = 10.57, p = 0.001 0.016 0.001 0.63
Acrophase 13:48 ± 10min 14:08 ± 8min 14:27 ± 9min F = 7.75, p = 0.001 0.059 0.001 0.245
IS 0.30 ± 0.05 0.33 ± 0.01 0.32 ± 0.006 F = 0.94, p = 0.39 ns
IV 0.99 ± 0.01 0.87 ± 0.02 0.98 ± 0.01 F = 9.68, p = 0.001 0.042 0.623 0.038
RA 0.73 ± 0.02 0.84 ± 0.02 0.77 ± 0.01 F = 4.10, p = 0.019 0.010 0.39 0.028
RAY 0.80 ± 0.03 0.89 ± 0.02 0.85 ± 0.01 F = 3.09, p = 0.049 0.003 0.046 0.53
CFI 0.51 ± 0.01 0.53 ± 0.01 0.51 ± 0.01 F = 0.41, p = 0.65 ns

All indexes are expressed as mean ± SD (Standard Deviation). Significant differences between weeks are marked in bold. IS, inter-day stability; IV, intra-day variability; RA, relative amplitude; RAY, Rayleigh tests; CFI, Circadian Function Index; ns, non-significant.