Skip to main content
. 2020 May 3;15:1177271920914585. doi: 10.1177/1177271920914585

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Differences in allostatic load living and dead zoo-housed western lowland gorillas (n = 60) for PS1 ALQ (t test, t = −2.592, df = 58, P = .012), PS2 ALQ (t test, t = −2.505, df = 58, P = .015), PS1 ALM (t test, t = −2.843, df = 58, P = .006), and PS2 ALM (t test, t = −2.231, df = 58, P = .030). ALI indicates allostatic load index; ALM, multimethod approach, allostatic load estimated using primarily 1-tailed quartiles but also some 2-tailed split quartiles (top and bottom 12.5%), depending on the biomarker (eg, cortisol); ALQ, allostatic load estimated using traditional 1-tailed quartiles for each biomarker; PS1, pooled sample 1, allostatic load estimated at each zoo independently prior to pooling the sample; PS2, pooled sample 2, allostatic load estimated after pooling biomarkers from all locations.