Skip to main content
. 2020 May 13;183:122–125. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.004

Table 2.

Analytic results (n = 242).a

MS F P η2part
Religious commitment
 Time (within) 1.04E-5 .000 .984 .000
 Time∗religious commitment .048 1.94 .165 .008
 Error (time) .025
 Religious commitment (between) 42.55 51.47 <.001 .177
Political orientation
 Time (within) .001 .023 .880 .000
 Time∗political orientation .105 4.29 .039 .018
 Error (time) .024
 Political orientation (between) 50.01 62.86 <.001 .208
EM Mean (SE) 95% CI N
Time 1 (December 2019)
 Low religious commitment 4.03 (.05) 3.93–4.13 162
 High religious commitment 3.38 (.08) 3.23–3.52 80
Time 2 (March 2020)
 Low religious commitment 4.01 (.05) 3.91–4.11 162
 High religious commitment 3.40 (.07) 3.26–3.54 80
Time 1 (December 2019)
 Liberal political orientation 4.06 (.05) 3.96–4.16 159
 Conservative political orientation 3.35 (.05) 3.21–3.49 83
Time 2 (March 2020)
 Liberal political orientation 4.03 (.07) 3.93–4.13 159
 Conservative political orientation 3.38 (.07) 3.25–3.52 83

MS = mean square; EM = estimated marginal; CI = confidence interval.

a

Levene's Test of Equality of Variances was violated for these analyses, but inspection of the variance for key variables indicates that interpretation of test results is still reasonable. For transparency, data are included as a supplement to this letter.