Table 6.
Region | Outcome | % Efficient Facilities | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0%-40% | 41%-69% | 70% and Above | Total | ||
n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n | ||
Eastern Africa (n = 12) | Scale efficiency | 2 (28.6) | 5 (71.4) | 0 (0.0) | 7 |
Technical efficiency | 3 (25.0) | 7 (58.3) | 2 (16.7) | 12 | |
Southern Africa (n = 10) | Allocative efficiency | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 |
Cost efficiency | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 | |
Scale efficiency | 3 (75.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (25.0) | 4 | |
Technical efficiency | 6 (60.0) | 2 (20.0) | 2 (20.0) | 10 | |
Western Africa (n = 16) | Allocative efficiency | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 |
Scale efficiency | 6 (75.0) | 1 (12.5) | 1 (12.5) | 8 | |
Technical efficiency | 9 (56.3) | 5 (31.3) | 2 (12.4) | 16 | |
Multiple Countries (n = 2) | Technical efficiency | 2 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 |