Skip to main content
. 2020 May 12;20:102. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00956-0

Table 5.

Effect of intervention on women’s choice of PPIUD (n = 14,950)

Est. 95% CI Est. 95% CI
Post-intervention (Ref: Pre-intervention) 0.062 * [0.021–0.081] 0.063 * [0.023–0.08]
Woman’s Age (Ref: 18–20)
 20–24 −0.008 [−0.021–0.008]
 25–29 −0.002 [−0.016–0.019]
 30+ −0.001 [−0.008–0.01]
Woman’s Education (Ref: Less than primary)
 Completed primary −0.015 [−0.054–0.022]
 Completed secondary −0.017 [−0.053–0.007]
 Some college −0.020 [−0.054–0.007]
Parity (Ref: 1)
 2 0.010 [− 0.001–0.024]
 3+ 0.025 [−0.003–0.056]
Marital Status (Ref: Currently married/living with partner)
 Formerly married/widowed −0.003 [−0.028–0.05]
 Never married/never lived together −0.004 [−0.015–0.01]
Religion (Ref: Catholic)
 Muslim −0.013 * [−0.04 - -0.002]
 Lutheran and Anglican −0.008 [−0.027–0.005]
 Pentecostal and Other Christian −0.015 [−0.025–0.002]
Fast Track (Ref: Normal track) 0.003 [−0.012–0.025]
Constant 0.000 [−0.029–0.035] 0.014 [−0.036–0.06]
Observations 14,950 14,950
R-squared 0.051 0.059

**p < 0.01, *p < 0.05

Note: p-values calculated using Wild Cluster Boostrap method. Regression models include month and hospital fixed effects