Skip to main content
. 2020 May 13;15:106. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01562-y

Table 2.

Mean Dice’s coefficient and Hausdorff distance values for multiple atlas libraries of normal organs

Size of atlas library
20 40 60
Femur
 DC (95% CI) 0.92 (0.90–0.95) 0.94 (0.93–0.96) 0.95 (0.94–0.96)
p-value ref. 0.289 0.335 (0.335++)
 HD (95% CI) 10.0 (7.8–15.4) 8.4 (6.0–10.8) 5.6 (4.0–7.4)
p-value ref. 0.285 0.046 (0.024++)
Femur-sm
 DC (95% CI) 0.93 (0.91–0.94) 0.94 (0.93–0.95) 0.95 (0.93–0.96)
p-value ref. 0.298 0.304 (0.139++)
p-value* 0.341 0.798 0.782
 HD (95% CI) 9.7 (7.2–12.2) 8.5 (6.3–10.8) 5.7 (4.5–7.1)
p-value ref. 0.466 0.023 (0.013++)
p-value* 0.162 0.869 0.794
ABAS-Bladder
 DC (95% CI) 0.57 (0.47–0.65) 0.53 (0.45–0.62) 0.54 (0.44–0.63)
p-value ref. 0.454 0.803 (0.096++)
 HD (95% CI) 44.6 (31.0–66.7) 59.1 (39.1–82.1) 60.2 (40.2–84.0)
p-value ref. 0.121 0.883 (0.024++)
ABASc-Bladder
 DC (95% CI) 0.78 (0.73–0.83) 0.85 (0.81–0.88) 0.84 (0.82–0.87)
p-value ref. 0.001 0.006 (0.398++)
p-value** 0.051 < 0.001 0.001
 HD (95% CI) 13.2 (11.8–14.6) 11.3 (10.6–12.0) 11.9 (11.1–12.9)
p-value ref. 0.031 0.085 (0.282++)
p-value** 0.196 0.020 0.007

Abbreviations ABAS atlas-based auto-segmentation alone, ABASc manually corrected ABAS, sm simultaneous, DC Dice’s coefficient, HD Hausdorff distance, CI confidence interval

* Comparison between Femur and Femur-sm

** Comparison between ABAS and ABASc

++Comparison between atlas sets sized 40 and 60