Skip to main content
. 2020 May 12;21:294. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03308-z

Table 3.

Confirmatory factor analysis indices obtained for the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS-Br) and for the EARS reasons for adherence (EARS-RA-Br) (n = 108)

CMIN/df CAIC CFI GFI ECVI (90% CI) RMSEA (90% CI)
Models EARS-Br
EARS-Br – 6 items# 1.89 70.14 0.97 0.93 0.38 (0.27–0.55) 0.08 (0.03–0.14)
EARS-RA-Br
EARS-RA-Br 10 items& 1.63 182.95 0.90 0.91 0.92 (0.77–1.13) 0.07 (0.03–0.11)
EARS-RA-Br 9 items&& 1.61 157.97 0.93 0.93 0.75 (0.62–0.94) 0.07 (0.02–0.12)

#One factor structure with 6 items relating to adherence behavior (6-items of section B) (Beinart et al., 2016)

&One factor structure with 10 questions relating to reasons for adherence (10-items of section C) of original EARS (Newman-Beinart et al., 2016)

&&One factor structure with 10 questions relating to reasons for adherence (10-items of section C) of original EARS (Newman-Beinart et al., 2016) with the exclusion of item 8

CMIN/df = χ2/df; CAIC = consistent Akaike information criterion; RMSEA = root-mean-square error of approximation; 90% CI = 90% confidence interval for RMSEA; CFI = comparative fit index; GFI = goodness of fit; ECVI = expected cross-validation index

n = sample size