Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 30;18(4):295–306. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v13i4.6892

Table 2.

Comparison of the mean sperm motility and sperm count in different groups


Groups Progressive motility (%) Non-progressive motility (%) Immotile (%)
Control 78.2 ± 3.8 15 ± 3.5 6.8 ± 2.2
Sham 80.4 ± 5.7 (p = 0.77) 13.4 ± 4 (p = 0.85) 7.8 ± 2.7 (p = 0.98)
CP 39.2 ± 1.3 (p <0.001)* 35.6 ± 1.1 (p < 0.001)* 25.2 ± 1.3 (p < 0.011)*
Ceratonia 79.2 ± 4.4 (p = 0.99) 16.6 ± 3.6 (p = 0.98) 6.2 ± 2.9 (p = 0.98)
Ceratonia + CP 70.2 ± 7.1 (p = 0.006) 16.8 ± 4.2 (p = 0.97) 13 ± 4.1 (p < 0.001)*
CP + Ceratonia 70.4 ± 4.2 (p = 0.008) 14.4 ± 4.2 (p = 0.99) 15.4 ± 2.5 (p < 0.001)*
Data presented as Mean ± SD (One-way ANOVA and Tukey's test, p < 0.05) *Significant difference between the specified group and the control group; Significant difference between the specified group and CP group