Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 30;18(4):295–306. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v13i4.6892

Table 5.

Comparison of the mean body weight, testis, and epididymis of mice in different groups


Groups Average initial weight of mice (gr) Average weight of mice at the end of treatment (gr) Average testicular weight of mice (gr) Average weight of rats epididymis (gr)
Control 207 ± 4.8 285 ± 22.9 1.49 ± 0.11 0.58 ± 0.03
Sham 204 ± 5.4 (p = 1.00) 280 ± 17.6 (p = 0.99) 1.48 ± 0.09 (p = 1.00) 0.56 ± 0.04 (p = 0.99)
CP 204 ± 7.7 (p = 1.00) 250 ± 18.7 (p < 0.04)* 1.52 ± 0.13 (p = 0.78) 0.57 ± 0.03 (p = 1.00)
Ceratonia 213 ± 9.7 (p = 0.77) 301 ± 17 (p = 0.08)* 1.6 ± 0.13 (p = 0.04) 0.61 ± 0.04 (p = 0.99)
Ceratonia + CP 211 ± 14 (p = 1.00) 281 ± 11.4 (p = 0.99) 1.51 ± 0.13 (p = 0.92) 0.56 ± 0.05 (p = 0.99)
CP + Ceratonia 203 ± 11.2 (p = 1.00) 266 ± 13.5 (p = 0.13) 1.57 ± 0.16 (p = 0.29) 0.56 ± 0.05 (p = 0.91)
Data presented as Mean + SD (One-way ANOVA and Tukey's test, p < 0.05) *Significant difference between the specified group and the control group; Significant difference between the specified group and CP group