Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 15;10(1):17–27.

Table 2.

Possible predictors of CRT super-response

Reduction > 30% LVESV Reduction < 30% LVESV p-value
Patient characteristics
    Sex M/F (n=20) 4/8 (n=12) 4/4 (n=8) 0.64
    Age (years) 58.67±9.99 57.5±7.19 0.87
    Quality of Life (Minnesota) 55.50±16.54 67.50±19.63 0.20
ECG
    QRS Reduction % 21.16±3.74 18.69±4.77 0.21
Echocardiogram
    LVEF % 29.25±3.64 26.5±6.67 0.38
    LVESV (ml) 145.83±43.35 167.00±78.94 0.75
    LVEDV (ml) 211.33±54.20 229.63±75.19 0.75
    LVEDD 66.33±5.10 67.67±12.34 0.82
    LA (mm) 41.58±3.87 43.63±5.65 0.45
Myocardial MRI
    LVEF % 23.42±5.4 22.75±6.75 0.58
    Fibrosis % 1.61±2.58 2.5±6.27 0.69
Ventricular stimulation
    Load of ventricular stimulation (%) 98.25±1.31 97.63±3.15 0.34

LVEF: Left ventricular ejection fraction; LVEDD: left ventricle end-diastolic diameter; LVESV: End-systolic volume; LVEDV: End-diastolic volume; ECG: Electrocardiogram; LA: Left atrium.