Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 31;9(4):346–359. doi: 10.1530/EC-19-0551

Table 1.

Participant characteristics and the impact of 12 weeks of aerobic exercise training on the two overweight groups of women.

Parameter LC LP OWC OWP OWC Pre-training OWC Post-training OWP Pre-training OWP Post-training
Participants per group (n) 16 16 13 14 8 8
Age (y) 28 ± 6a 26 ± 3ab 35 ± 4 31 ± 6 35 ± 4 31 ± 6
BMI (kg/m2) 22 ± 2ab 23 ± 2ab 36 ± 5 37 ± 7 37 ± 6 36 ± 5 36 ± 6 36 ± 7
WHR 0.83 (5.9) 0.84 (4.7) 0.84 (12.1) 0.85 (6.7)
DXA
 Body fat (%) 27 (28)ab 30 (28)ab 50 (11) 47 (8) 50 (12) 48 (13) 45 (8) 45 (10)
 Fat mass (kg) 16.4 ± 5.0ab 20.1 ± 6.7ab 48.3 ± 10.6 46.3 ± 10.4 48 (30) 46 (27)e 42 (26) 41 (30)
CT
 Abdominal SCF (cm2) 185 ± 74ab 229 ± 74ab 571 ± 155 582 ± 174 528 (49) 525 (52)e 520 (34) 498 (34)
 Abdominal VF (cm2) 32 ± 22ab 35 ± 10ab 117 ± 31 135 ± 58 120 (47) 125 (49) 123 (69) 110 (77)f
Glucose homeostasis
 FBG (mmol/L) 4.5 ± 0.3bc 4.6 ±0.4 4.8 ± 0.3 5.0 ± 0.6 4.7 (3.8) 4.8 (6.4) 5.0 (10) 5.0 (5.1)
 FP insulin (pmol/L) 5.0 ± 4.1ab 4.5 ± 1.7 ab 16.6 ± 6.0 b 28.5 ± 12.8 17 (46)h 18 (55) 27 (59) 21 (86)e
 Clamp 30 min plasma insulin (pmol/L) 59.1 ± 7.5ab 58.2 ± 12.4ab 84.7 ± 20 99.6 ± 34 83 (34) 77 (25) 91 (50) 88 (73)
 HOMA-IR 0.9 (65)ab 0.9 (44)ab 3.3 (41)b 5.8 (64) 3.5 (47)h 3.3 (56) 6.1 (63) 4.5 (92)
 GIR (mg/min/m2) 332 (29)abc 270 (26)b 250 (29)b 131 (105) 245 (57)h 293 (36)e 117 (141) 170 (75)e
Lipid profiles
 Cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.8 ± 0.6 4.9 ± 0.7 4.8 ± 0.8 4.9 ± 1.3 4.7 (29) 4.9 (23) 4.5 (33) 4.4 (22)
 Triglycerides (mmol/L) 0.9 ± 0.7b 0.7 ± 0.3b 1.2 ± 0.6b 1.6 ±1.0 1.0 (35) 1.2 (42) 1.2 (68) 0.9 (67)e,g
 LDL/HDL 1.65 (38)ab 1.61 (29)ab 2.37 (24) 3.27 (54) 2.4 (31)i 2.5 (42) 3.2 (75) 3.0 (51)
Androgens
 Testosterone (pmol/L) 1.67 ± 0.46b 2.14 ± 0.80 1.61 ± 0.79b 2.66 ± 0.63 1.4 (48)h 1.5 (86) 2.6 (27) 2.5 (53)
 SHBG (mmol/L) 78 ± 21ab 72 ± 33ab 45 ± 30 28 ± 2 44 (78)i 47 (79) 26 (32) 29 (38)
 FAI (%) 2.2 (52)ab 3.14 (82)b 3.64 (101)b 9.47 (51) 3.1 (86)h 3.3 (103) 10.1 (39) 8.6 (66)
Fitness
 VO2peak (mL/kg/min) 38.7 (22)ab 35.2 (22)ab 24.9 (13) 24.3 (30) 25.7 (12.5) 30.3 (11.3)d 25.3 (29.6) 31.1 (27.0)d
PCOS diagnosis
 NIH participants (n)j 4 13 8
 Rotterdam participants (n)k 16 14 8

Data are from the subset of women included in this ancillary analysis (9, 28) and presented as mean ± s.d. or when data were log transformed they are presented as a back transformed mean (±s.d. as a CV%). Statistical differences are reported for between groups (LC, LP, OWC and OWP) after adjusting for age meeting both P < 0.05 and clear effects at the 99%CI: asignificantly different from overweight controls P ≤ 0.05; bsignificantly different from overweight PCOS P ≤ 0.05; csignificantly different from lean PCOS P ≤ 0.05. Statistical differences are reported for training sub-group: dsignificantly different from pre-training P ≤ 0.01; esignificantly different from pre-training P ≤ 0.05; fsignificantly different change between groups P ≤ 0.01; gtrend for difference from pre-training P < 0.1; hsignificantly different from PCOS (untrained values) P ≤ 0.01; isignificantly different from PCOS (untrained values) P ≤ 0.05; jnumber of participants in the group considered to meet NIH diagnostic criteria; knumber of participants in the group considered to meet Rotterdam diagnostic criteria.

BMI, body mass index; CT, computer tomography; DXA, dual x-ray absorptiometry; FAI, free androgen index; GIR-Clamp, glucose infusion rate; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model of insulin resistance (39); LC, lean control; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; LP, lean PCOS; n/a, not applicable; OWC, overweight control; OWP, overweight PCOS; SCF, subcutaneous fat; SHBG, steroid hormone-binding globulin; VF, visceral fat; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio.