Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: Pain. 2018 Feb;159(2):342–350. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001102

Table 2.

Location Scale Models Comparing Levels and Variability in Negative Emotions across Patients and Spouses

Negative Affect Model 2: Inclusion of Covariates
  B SE z p

Means
Intercept 6.28 .83 7.55 .000
Time .00 .00 −6.87 .000
Patient 4.98 1.16 4.28 .000
Between Subject Variance
Intercept 4.25 .10 42.93 .000
Within Subject Variance
Intercept 4.17 .03 145.33 .000
Time .00 .00 −12.04 .000
Patient .26 .03 10.46 .000

Negative Affect Model 3: Inclusion of Random Effects
B SE z p

Means
Intercept 5.83 .80 7.27 .000
Time .00 .00 −8.04 .000
Patient 4.83 1.13 4.27 .000
Between Subject Variance
Intercept 4.20 .10 41.22 .000
Within Subject Variance
Intercept 3.48 .14 24.54 .000
Time <.01 .00 −15.64 .000
Patient .39 .20 1.95 .051
Random Effects
Random Location (mean and variability) .92 .09 10.33 .000
Random Scale (remaining variability) 1.08 .06 19.53 .000