Table 1.
Quality Index Item Number |
Criteria | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
GC | General criteria | |||
GC1 | Was the process to avoid technology lock explained? | Yes = 1 | No = 0 | |
GC2 | Was the data download moment mentioned? | Yes = 1 | No = 0 | |
Reliability and validity | ||||
GC3 | Was the brand/model mentioned? | Yes = 1 | No = 0 | |
GC4 | Were the variability and reliability of the model cited? | Yes = 1 | No = 0 | |
GC5 | Was the model assessed for variability or reliability according to the variables used? (Multi-player vs single player) | Yes = 1 | No = 0 | |
GC6 | How was the validation test performed? | Continuous situations = 2 | No continuous situations = 1 | Not cited = 0 |
GC7 | Were data exclusion criteria mentioned? | Yes = 1 | No = 0 | |
GC8 | Was a sensor fusion algorithm explained (only for velocity and acceleration)? | Yes = 1 | No = 0 | |
Sampling frequency | ||||
GC9 | Was the raw data justified? | Yes = 2 | No = 1 | No appearance = 0 |
GC10 | Was the software-derived data justified? | Yes = 2 | No = 1 | No appearance = 0 |
GC11 | Was a data reduction method mentioned? | Yes = 1 | No = 0 | |
GC12 | Were different Hz values used for each variable reported? | Yes = 1 | No = 0 | |
GC13 | Was the time synchronisation method explained (only for collective measures (i.e. tactical variables)? | Yes = 1 | No = 0 |