Table 2.
ANOVA and descriptive statistics for the coherence pairs showing significant increases in the high theta band during the high, compared with the low, goal-conflict condition
| Coherence pair | F(1,33) | p | η p 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| LF and MF | 8.38 | <.01 | .202 |
| LF and RF | 7.56 | <.05 | .186 |
| LF and MFC | 6.86 | <.05 | .172 |
| LF and RFC | 16.30 | <.001 | .332 |
| LF and LPO | 5.79 | <.05 | .149 |
| LF and MPO | 4.49 | <.05 | .120 |
| MF and RF | 9.50 | <.005 | .223 |
| MF and LFC | 8.23 | <.01 | .200 |
| MF and MFC | 8.01 | <.01 | .195 |
| MF and MPO | 19.51 | <.001 | .372 |
| RF and LFC | 4.76 | <.05 | .126 |
| RF and MFC | 4.15 | <.05 | .112 |
| RF and LPO | 4.39 | <.05 | .117 |
| RF and MPO | 4.76 | <.05 | .126 |
| RF and RPO | 5.14 | <.05 | .135 |
| LFC and MFC | 4.40 | <.05 | .118 |
| LFC and RFC | 8.28 | <.01 | .201 |
| LFC and MPO | 7.66 | <.01 | .188 |
| MFC and LPO | 8.28 | <.01 | .201 |
| MFC and MPO | 7.66 | <.01 | .188 |
| MFC and RPO | 4.72 | <.05 | .125 |
| RFC and MPO | 4.46 | <.05 | .119 |
| RFC and RPO | 4.93 | <.05 | .130 |
LPO, left parietooccipital; LFC, left frontocentral; RPO, right parietooccipital.