Skip to main content
. 2020 May 13;15(5):e0232873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232873

Table 5. Summary findings and implications for cost data collection.

Cost head Ranking in order of share in cost (% share of cost) Data type Median rating of Difficulty of collection (Scale of 1–10) Level of uncertainty in variable * Prioritization in data collection* Possible type of data collector (T/NT) **
Human resource 1 (41%) HR Salary & Incentives 5 + +++ NT
Time allocation 4 +++ +++ T
Leave 3 ++ ++ NT
Consumable items 2 (36%) Prices of consumables 7 +++ +++ NT
Consumables used 5 + ++ T
Physical area/ building 3 (11%) Determination of rental price 2 +++ +++ NT
Building area measurement 4 + ++ NT
Equipment 4 (5%) Equipment used 5 + ++ T
Equipment prices 6 +++ ++ NT
Average life of equipment 5 +++ ++ T
Usage of equipment in different procedures 7 ++ ++ T
Utility 5 (3%) Dietetics 4 + + NT
Laundry 4 + + NT
Overheads 6 (2%) Electricity 5 + + NT
Building Maintenance 3.5 + + NT
Equipment Maintenance 4 + + NT
Biomedical waste management 3 + + NT
Furniture / Non-consumable items 7 (1%) Furniture items used 5 + + NT
Prices of non-consumable items 7 +++ + NT
Average life of furniture items 5 +++ + T

* +: Low; ++: Moderate; +++: High

** T(Technical): Personnel with experience in costing cost data collection; NT(Non-technical): Personnel with understanding of the health system functioning