Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Use Misuse. 2017 May 30;52(9):1133–1138. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1298620

Table 2.

Study 1 Regression

Bootstrapped Regression Estimate BSE Lower CI Upper CI Z p
Outcome: Heavy Drinking Frequency
Intercept 3.54 1.40 0.78 6.21 2.54 0.01
Age −0.11 0.08 −0.26 0.05 −1.35 0.18
Female 0.38 0.12 0.61 0.14 3.13 <.001
White 0.22 0.13 −0.05 0.46 1.71 0.09
Academic Year −0.05 0.10 −0.26 0.14 −0.53 0.60
Fraternity House vs. On-campus 0.85 0.28 0.30 1.40 3.00 <.001
Off-campus vs. On-campus 0.90 0.19 0.54 1.29 4.78 <.001
Outcome: Peak Number of Drinks
Intercept 3.93 0.91 2.21 5.68 4.33 0.00
Age −0.02 0.05 −0.11 0.08 −0.32 0.87
Female 0.71 0.07 0.84 0.57 10.12 <.001
White 0.21 0.08 0.04 0.38 2.47 0.01
Academic Year −0.12 0.07 −0.25 0.01 −1.83 0.05
Fraternity House vs. On-campus 0.38 0.15 0.09 0.68 2.53 <.001
Off-campus vs. On-campus 0.49 0.11 0.28 0.70 4.60 <.001
Outcome: Consequences
Intercept 6.55 2.73 1.22 11.94 2.40 0.02
Age −0.21 0.15 −0.50 0.09 −1.34 0.18
Female −0.23 0.23 −0.67 0.22 −1.02 0.31
White 0.41 0.25 −0.12 0.89 1.61 0.11
Academic Year −0.09 0.19 −0.46 0.25 −0.50 0.62
Fraternity House vs. On-campus 0.69 0.54 −0.33 1.80 1.28 0.20
Off-campus vs. On-campus 1.73 0.34 1.06 2.40 5.10 <.001

Note. Bold font highlights significant effects within each model.