Table 3.
Hierarchical generalized linear regression modeling examining reconviction within 5 years (n = 1362)
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coef | SE | Coef | SE | Coef | SE | Coef | SE | |
| HSR attendance | − 0.048 | 0.027 | 0.041 | 0.763 | − 0.049 | 0.032 | − 0.047 | 0.027 |
| Program: cognitive | 0.074 | 0.137 | 0.075 | 0.137 | 0.070 | 0.137 | 0.077 | 0.137 |
| Program: jobs | 0.167 | 0.388 | 0.166 | 0.388 | 0.174 | 0.388 | 0.157 | 0.388 |
| Program: education | 0.121 | 0.191 | 0.121 | 0.191 | 0.119 | 0.192 | 0.124 | 0.191 |
| Program: AOD | 0.177 | 0.142 | 0.177 | 0.142 | 0.169 | 0.142 | 0.174 | 0.142 |
| Sanctions | 0.341** | 0.031 | 0.341** | 0.031 | 0.342** | 0.031 | 0.342** | 0.031 |
| Assessed risk | 1.591** | 0.359 | 1.590** | 0.359 | 1.596** | 0.359 | 1.586** | 0.359 |
| Gang member | 0.142 | 0.235 | 0.142 | 0.235 | 0.141 | 0.235 | 0.137 | 0.235 |
| Current offense: violent | − 0.219 | 0.168 | − 0.219 | 0.168 | − 0.219 | 0.168 | − 0.225 | 0.168 |
| Current offense: drug | − 0.011 | 0.152 | − 0.010 | 0.153 | − 0.017 | 0.152 | − 0.005 | 0.152 |
| Current offense sexual | − 0.042 | 0.196 | − 0.042 | 0.196 | − 0.048 | 0.196 | − 0.037 | 0.196 |
| Time served | 0.187 | 0.147 | 0.188 | 0.147 | 0.188 | 0.147 | 0.185 | 0.147 |
| Age | − 0.011+ | 0.007 | − 0.011+ | 0.007 | − 0.012+ | 0.007 | − 0.012+ | 0.007 |
| White | − 0.439* | 0.175 | − 0.438* | 0.175 | − 0.439* | 0.175 | − 0.438* | 0.175 |
| County-level | ||||||||
| Adherence | − 0.955** | 0.356 | − 0.934* | 0.398 | − 0.953** | 0.355 | − 0.931** | 0.356 |
| Disadvantage | 0.177* | 0.077 | 0.177* | 0.077 | 0.139 | 0.087 | 0.168* | 0.082 |
| Social service | − 0.119 | 0.274 | − 0.118 | 0.275 | − 0.123 | 0.275 | − 0.018 | 0.258 |
| HSR*adherence | − 0.016 | 0.133 | ||||||
| HSR* disadvantage | .151** | 0.057 | ||||||
| HSR*social service | − 0.091+ | 0.046 | ||||||
| Random variation | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.09 | ||||
| chi2 | 181.20** | 181.19** | 181.61** | 182.74** | ||||
All models include controls for county population, police force size, inequality, and the presence of a metropolitan area
SE Standard error
p < .05;
p < .01;
p < .10