Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Pollut. 2020 Feb 20;261:114183. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114183

Table 1.

Phyla and genera differences in gut microbial populations shown in actual reads and relative abundance

Cellulose + Vehicle Cellulose + PCB 126 Inulin + Vehicle Inulin + PCB 126
Phyla Actual Reads Relative Abundance(%) Actual Reads Relative Abundance (%) Actual Reads Relative Abundance (%) Actual Reads Relative Abundance (%)
Actinobacteria# 17.8 ± 3.2 0.02 ± 0.004 32.7 ± 9.8 0.04 ± 0.01 604.0 ± 137.4* 0.74 ± 0.18* 1443.2 ±197.5* 1.94 ± 0.25*
Bacteroidetes# 12730.8 ± 2468.6 15.35 ± 2.72 10020.2 ± 1636.8 13.23 ± 2.15 28962.1 ± 1983.8* 36.97 ± 4.17* 15946.7 ± 1894.5 21.70 ± 2.59
Firmicutes# 28488.4 ± 2974.5 34.02 ± 1.99 22729.7 ± 1972.2 29.48 ± 2.31 20001.8 ± 2243.2 27.48 ± 3.49 24398.2 ± 2434.9 32.04 ± 1.92
Proteobacteria$@ 2920.3 ± 706.1 3.47 ± 0.89 1364.4 ±246.8 1.80 ± 0.33 1599.3 ± 134.6 2.15 ± 0.24 1013.8 ±133.3 1.37 ± 0.18
Tenericutes# 83.0 ± 40.1 0.09 ± 0.04 137.9 ±37.5 0.19 ± 0.05 203.7 ± 48.0 0.27 ± 0.07 78.8 ± 23.2 0.10 ± 0.03
Verrucomicrobia$@ 37404.8 ± 2784.3 46.59 ± 3.55 43083.4 ± 3849.8 54.95 ± 3.07 21070.8 ± 2235.6* 31.68 ± 3.91* 31417.9 ± 2044.9 41.79 ± 1.21
Genera Actual Reads Relative Abundance(%) Actual Reads Relative Abundance (%) Actual Reads Relative Abundance (%) Actual Reads Relative Abundance (%)
Bifidobacterium# 12.1 ± 3.0 0.02 ± 0.003 24.1 ± 9.7 0.03 ± 0.01 597.2 ± 136.7* 0.66 ± 0.18* 1432.5 ± 196.6* 1.92 ± 0.25*
Lactobacillus# 19.8 ± 6.7 0.03 ± 0.01 13.1 ± 4.8 0.02 ± 0.01 152.1 ± 41.9* 0.17 ± 0.06* 403.1 ± 95.9* 0.51 ± 0.09*
Lactococcus- 219.6 ± 42.7 0.27 ± 0.05 212.1 ± 72.4 0.26 ± 0.08 123.7 ± 19.5 0.17 ± 0.03 161.3 ± 31.3 0.23 ± 0.04
Turicibactef# 38.5 ± 10.4 0.05 ± 0.01 11.7 ± 3.0 0.01 ± 0.003 3.6 ± 0.8* 0.01 ± 0.001* 3.9 ± 1.3 0.005 ± 0.001
Clostridium$ 18.4 ± 4.3 0.02 ± 0.004 19.6 ± 2.9 0.03 ± 0.004 4.2 ± 1.4* 0.01 ± 0.002* 2.5 ± 0.7* 0.004 ± 0.001*
Dehalobacterium@ 74.2 ± 8.8 0.09 ± 0.01 43.9 ± 7.7 0.06 ± 0.01 88.3 ± 23.2 0.10 ± 0.03 46.3 ± 7.9 0.06 ± 0.01
Coprococcus# 302.0 ± 38.0 0.36 ± 0.04 863.6 ± 234.4 1.09 ± 0.26 61.9 ± 21.0* 0.19 ± 0.03* 108.7 ± 23.5 0.14 ± 0.02
Dorea# 126.0 ±14.7 0.16 ± 0.02 41.2 ± 13.4 0.05 ± 0.02 21.3 ± 8.2* 0.03 ± 0.01* 16.4 ± 4.7* 0.02 ± 0.01*
[Ruminococcus]# 462.0 ± 58.0 0.55 ± 0.04 560.4 ± 35.1 0.72 ± 0.05 129.0 ± 16.3 0.22 ± 0.03 908.0 ± 193.5 1.28 ± 0.29
rc4–4# 1405.0 ± 409.1 1.66 ± 0.44 0.8 ± 0.5 0.001 ± 0.0004 211.0 ± 96.1* 0.23 ± 0.13* 249.0 ± 44.9* 0.33 ± 0.05*
Oscillospira$@ 2755.2 ± 352.2 3.26 ± 0.25 1784.1 ± 214.2 2.27 ± 0.21 1251.0 ± 215.7* 1.64 ± 0.32* 1115.0 ± 118.4 1.53 ± 0.19
Ruminococcus# 727.4 ± 63.9 0.89 ± 0.06 861.8 ± 85.1 1.12 ± 0.10 545.6 ± 75.5 0.73 ± 0.12 340.8 ± 58.4* 0.45 ± 0.07*
Allobaculum# 5064.8 ± 1593.3 5.92 ±1.74 2007.5 ± 565.8 2.64 ± 0.77 12019.1 ± 2319.5* 13.59 ± 3.05 14419.7 ± 1895.7* 18.66 ± 1.52*
Coprobacillus$ 66.9 ± 14.2 0.08 ± 0.02 82.8 ± 16.1 0.11 ± 0.02 1.0 ± 0.5* 0.01 ± 0.002* 2.8 ± 1.0* 0.004 ± 0.001*
Sutterella# 772.2 ± 295.0 0.90 + 0.35 1092.1 ± 178.2 1.46 + 0.26 1585.3 ± 135.0* 1.93 ± 0.25* 993.7 ± 133.1 1.35 ± 0.17
Desulfovibrio# 2129.3± 811.1 2.55 + 1.01 6.2 ± 1.4 0.008 + 0.001 2.6 ± 0.8* 0.004 ± 0.001* 7.6 ± 3.6 0.01 ± 0.003
Akkermansia$@ 37403.2 ± 2784.1 46.59 + 3.55 43081.5 ± 3849.6 54.94 + 3.07 21070.1 ± 2235.5* 31.68 ± 3.91* 31416.8 ± 2044.5 41.79 ± 1.21

Phyla and genera displayed are those with consistent quantifiable reads. Phyla classified as “other” were not included in the table.

*

indicates a significant difference compared to cellulose diet of same treatment;

indicates a significant difference compared to vehicle of same diet (n=10).

$

indicates a significant diet effect,

@

indicates a significant exposure,

#

indicates a significant interaction between diet and exposure. Data analyzed by two-way ANOVA with post hoc comparisons of the means.