Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 28;181(3):599–610. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05645-y

Table 4.

Crude and adjusted regression coefficients of the association between sensory nerve coaptation and mean monofilament scores per area

Crude coefficients 95% CI p value Adjusted coefficients 95% CI p value
1  − 0.068  − 0.517 to 0.382 0.768  − 0.219  − 0.679 to 0.241 0.350
2  − 0.093  − 0.445 to 0.258 0.603  − 0.244  − 0.542 to 0.053 0.107
3 0.021  − 0.293 to 0.335 0.896  − 0.076  − 0.380 to 0.228 0.623
4 0.017  − 0.471 to 0.506 0.944  − 0.033  − 0.568 to 0.502 0.903
Native skin  − 0.057  − 0.428 to 0.313 0.761  − 0.118  − 0.486 to 0.250 0.531
5  − 0.365  − 0.678 to − 0.052 0.022  − 0.488  − 0.776 to − 0.200 0.001
6  − 0.357  − 0.651 to − 0.064 0.017  − 0.499  − 0.779 to − 0.220  < 0.001
7  − 0.172  − 0.422 to 0.078 0.178  − 0.268  − 0.531 to − 0.005 0.046
8  − 0.314  − 0.601 to − 0.027 0.032  − 0.449  − 0.744 to − 0.155 0.003
9  − 0.282  − 0.580 to 0.016 0.064  − 0.374  − 0.655 to − 0.093 0.009
Flap skin  − 0.384  − 0.640 to − 0.128 0.003  − 0.439  − 0.734 to − 0.145 0.003
Total skin  − 0.185  − 0.404 to 0.034 0.98  − 0.287  − 0.458 to − 0.115 0.001

Statistically significant p values are indicated in italic

Adjusted for length of follow up in months, timing of breast reconstruction (immediate versus delayed), type of flap (DIEP versus LTP) and history of radiotherapy