Skip to main content
. 2020 May 7;10:551. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00551

Table 2.

Distribution of quantitative imaging features at various levels of concordance and redundancy limits (Rsq at ≥0.99 and ≥0.95) for regions identified by (A) radiologist marked and (B) habitats converged (sphere), (C) habitat converged (≤ median, ADC map).

(A). Radiologist marked
Concordance and dynamic range with redundancy reduction (Rsq 0.99) Test–retest mpMRI: number of features (radiologist)
CCC and DR and (Rsq 0.99) ADC ADCz T2 T2z
≥0.95 0 0 0 0
≥0.90 0 0 3 0
≥0.85 0 0 4 1
≥0.80 0 0 5 3
≥0.75 0 0 9 6
≥0.70 1 3 13 10
≥0.65 2 3 19 12
(B). Habitat converged (Sphere)
Concordance and dynamic range with redundancy reduction (Rsq ≥0.99) Test–retest mpMRI: number of features (habitats)
CCC and DR and (Rsq ≥0.95) ADC ADCz T2 T2z
≥0.95 0 0 0 1
≥0.90 0 0 1 2
≥0.85 1 0 3 6
≥0.80 4 3 6 11
≥0.75 6 5 8 14
≥0.70 9 8 13 18
≥0.65 15 15 18 23
(C). Habitat (≤median ADC map)
Concordance and dynamic range 0.65 and Rsq ≥0.99
CCC and DR ADC ADCz T2 T2z
≥0.95 0 0 3 1
≥0.90 0 0 4 1
≥0.85 0 0 4 1
≥0.80 0 0 4 3
≥0.75 0 0 7 3
≥0.70 0 0 10 5
≥0.65 1 1 12 10