Table 5. Proportion of patients showing delay and no delay in Patna (A) and Mumbai (B) based on the type of facility at first point of care.
| (A) Patna | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic/treatment delay | Baseline private
(n=60) |
Baseline public
(n=4) |
End-line private
(n=46) |
End-line public
(n=4) |
End-line PPIA
private (n=14) |
| No diagnostic delay | 36 (60%) | 4 (100%) | 18 (39.1%) | 2 (50%) | 9 (64.3%) |
| With diagnostic delay | 24 (40%) | 0 (0%) | 28 (60.9%) | 3 (75%) | 5 (35.7%) |
| No treatment delay | 56 (93.4%) | 3 (75%) | 43 (93.5%) | 4 (100%) | 14 (100%) |
| With treatment delay | 4 (6.6%) | 1 (25%) | 3 (6.5%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| (B) Mumbai | |||||
| Diagnostic/treatment delay | Baseline private
(n=53) |
Baseline public
(n=23) |
End-line private
(n=37) |
End-line public
(n=18) |
End-line PPIA
private (n=31) |
| No diagnostic delay | 22 (41.5%) | 13 (56.5%) | 11 (29.7%) | 10 (55.6%) | 15 (48.4%) |
| With diagnostic delay | 31 (58.5%) | 10 (43.5%) | 26 (70.1%) | 8 (44.4%) | 16 (51.6%) |
| No treatment delay | 41 (77.4%) | 22 (95.7%) | 28 (75.7%) | 10 (55.6%) | 23 (74.2%) |
| With treatment delay | 12 (22.6%) | 1 (4.3%) | 9 (24.3%) | 8 (44.4%) | 8 (25.8%) |