Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 18;9(10):3371–3382. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2865

Table 2.

Treatment and outcome of 52 patients with acute myeloid leukemia reinduced with CLAM

Parameter Value
Response
CR 36 (69.2%)
CRi 11 (21.2%)
Nonremission 5 (9.6%)
CLAM consolidation
One cycle 20 (38.4%)
Two cycles 7 (13.4%)
Median number of cycles of CLAM consolidation (range) 1 (0‐2)
Allogeneic HSCTa
HLA‐matched sibling donors 13 (25%)
Voluntary‐unrelated donors 11 (21.1%)
Myeloablative conditioning 17 (32.6%)
Reduced‐intensity conditioning 7 (13.4%)
Relapses 21 (40.4%)
Deaths 17 (32.7%)
Deaths from refractory leukemia 16 (30.8%)
Deaths from graft vs host disease 1 (2%)
Deaths within 60 d of the first cycle of CLAM 0
Survivals
Median overall survival, mo (95% CI) Not reached
2‐y overall survival 65.8%
Median relapse‐free survival, mo (95% CI) 23 (17‐26)
2‐y relapse‐free survival 45.7%
Median event‐free survival, mo (95% CI) 22 (14‐30)
2‐y event‐free survival 40.2%

Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CI, confidence interval; CLAM, clofarabine, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone; CR, complete remission; Cri, complete remission with incomplete hematological recovery; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

a

22 patients received allogeneic HSCT after CLAM‐induced CR/CRi; 1 patient relapsed after CLAM, received salvage azacitidine and decitabine, and then an allogeneic HSCT; 1 patient not responding to CLAM was treated with decitabine and then received an allogeneic HSCT.