Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 30;8(1):36–42. doi: 10.14791/btrt.2020.8.e3

Table 3. Comparison of diagnostic performance between 2D fractal model and 3D fractal model for predicting the meningioma grade.

Models AUC (95% CI) Accuracy (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) p value*
2D fractal model 0.690 (0.581–0.799) 72.4 75.8 64.4 Reference
3D fractal model 0.813 (0.733–0.878) 82.9 81.8 70.0 <0.001

*p-value refers to the significance among the differences of the AUCs between the 2D fractal and 3D fractal models. AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three-dimensional