Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 10;10(4):719. doi: 10.3390/nano10040719

Table 1.

Electro-oxidation parameters of EG by various noble metal-based catalysts in an alkaline medium.

Catalyst Ep (V) Jf/Jb
Au nanostars [24] 0.2 (vs. sat. calomel) 3.71
AuPd@Pd nanocrystals [86] ca. −0.7 (vs. sat. calomel) 2.41
Au nanocrystals [86] ca. 0.3 (vs. sat. calomel) 2.31
AuPd NW networks [29] ca. 0.025 (vs. sat. calomel) ca. 0.8
AuPd Nanoflowers [79] ca. −0.01 (vs. sat. calomel) ca. 0.75
Hollow AuAg1Cu1 nanoflowers [87] −0.22 (vs. sat. calomel) ca. 2.6
3D Au33Cu67 ultrathin NW network [51] ca. 0.3 (vs. sat. calomel) ca. 4.2
PdAuRu nanocrystals [88] −0.1 (vs. sat. calomel) ca. 1.92
Open bowl-like Pt1Au1Ag1 nanocages [19] ca. 0.6 (vs. sat. calomel) ca. 4.7
3D Pt5.7Pb ultrathin NW networks [89] ca. −0.1 (vs. sat. calomel) ca. 5.7
Pt31Cu69 NWs [90] −0.1 (vs. sat. calomel) ca. 1.97
Screw-like PtPd NWs [91] ca. 0.1 (vs. sat. calomel) ca. 0.842
Pt1Co1 NWs [92] ca. 0.505 (vs. sat. calomel) ca. 1.26
AuAg NWs (9.2 nm) (this work) 0.22 (vs. sat. calomel) 1.7
AuAg NWs (3.8 nm) (this work) 0.193 (vs. sat. calomel) 3.2