Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 13;10(4):743. doi: 10.3390/nano10040743

Table A1.

Numerical results of the BIPYPAR model vs. the true BIPY values (graphically shown in Figure 3c).

AR = 0.5 AR = 1.0 AR = 1.5 AR = 2.0
BIPY–BIPYPAR BIPY–BIPYPAR BIPY–BIPYPAR BIPY–BIPYPAR
<Lw>M (nm) 5.83–5.80 5.59–5.59 5.19–5.22 5.11–5.12
<2Lh>M (nm) 2.80–2.72 6.14–6.48 8.37–7.94 9.26–8.45
σw/<Lw>M (×100) 18.36–17.55 16.99–16.86 15.87–19.00 15.44–19.76
σh/<2Lh>M (×100) 23.37–24.96 23.75–33.06 23.55–33.51 22.15–33.16
AR = <2Lh>M/<Lw>M 0.48–0.47 1.10–1.16 1.61–1.52 1.81–1.65
AR = <2Lh/Lw>M 0.50–0.48 1.13–1.18 1.64–1.54 1.83–1.67
{001} surface area % 41.34–42.71 15.17–15.02 6.04–8.34 3.90–6.62
{101} surface area % 58.66–57.29 84.83–84.98 93.96–91.66 96.10–93.38