Skip to main content
. 2020 May 13;77(9):1–11. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0821

Table 2. Results of Meta-regression Analysis.

Characteristic Multivariate model of all studies
β (SE) Wald statistic P value
Intercept −1.12 (0.80) 1.93 .17
Wisdom component
Emotional regulation (vs prosocial behaviors) −0.12 (0.53) 0.05 .82
Spirituality (vs prosocial behaviors) −0.32 (0.42) 0.57 .45
Participant type
With physical illness (vs community based) 0.59 (0.56) 1.11 .29
With psychiatric illness (vs community based) 0.09 (0.34) 0.07 .79
Mean age, y 0.08 (0.04) 5.11 .02
Women, % 0.003 (0.008) 0.16 .69
Intervention format
Individual (vs group) 0.39 (0.42) 0.87 .35
Sessions, No. −0.02 (0.03) 0.55 .46
Length of sessions, min 0.002 (0.002) 1.03 .31
SASQI
Scores in top 50th percentile (vs bottom 50th percentile) −0.91 (0.44) 4.39 .04
Interaction terms
Wisdom component (prosocial behavior) × mean age 0.00 [Reference] NA NA
Wisdom component (emotional regulation) × mean age −0.06 (0.04) 2.18 .14
Wisdom component (spirituality) × mean age −0.13 (0.04) 9.64 .002
Wisdom component (prosocial behavior) × SASQI Score (top 50th percentile) 0.00 [Reference] NA NA
Wisdom component (emotional regulation) × SASQI Score (top 50th percentile) 0.78 (0.87) 0.80 .37
Wisdom component (spirituality) × SASQI Score (top 50th percentile) 4.17 (1.07) 15.1 <.001

Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; SASQI, Scale for Assessing Scientific Quality of Investigations (modified version).